2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-highly sensitive and wash-free bio-detection of H5N1 virus by immunomagnetic reduction assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods are categorized based on the type of detection target: nucleic acid-based detection, virus isolation and identification, antigen detection, antibody detection, etc. (Alberini et al 2009;Chen et al 2008;Ho et al 2009;Moore et al 2010;Payungporn et al 2006;Xie et al 2006;Yang et al 2008) The most commonly used detection methods are nucleic acid-based detection, such as reverse-transcription PCR, Real-time PCR, RT-LAMP, antibody detection and antigen detection (Antarasena et al 2007;Deng et al 2011;He et al 2007;Kang et al 2010;Khurana et al 2011;Shahsavandi et al 2011;Yea et al 2010;Zhao et al 2010). However, most of these methods require specialized equipment and highly trained operators, and these detection processes are time consuming, thereby making them impractical for point-of-care (POCT) detection (Yager et al 2008 Quantum dots (QDs) have been broadly used for biological labeling and imaging due to their unique optical properties, i.e., a broad excitation spectrum and a narrow and symmetric emission peak (Lu et al 2011;Medintz et al 2005;Zhou et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are categorized based on the type of detection target: nucleic acid-based detection, virus isolation and identification, antigen detection, antibody detection, etc. (Alberini et al 2009;Chen et al 2008;Ho et al 2009;Moore et al 2010;Payungporn et al 2006;Xie et al 2006;Yang et al 2008) The most commonly used detection methods are nucleic acid-based detection, such as reverse-transcription PCR, Real-time PCR, RT-LAMP, antibody detection and antigen detection (Antarasena et al 2007;Deng et al 2011;He et al 2007;Kang et al 2010;Khurana et al 2011;Shahsavandi et al 2011;Yea et al 2010;Zhao et al 2010). However, most of these methods require specialized equipment and highly trained operators, and these detection processes are time consuming, thereby making them impractical for point-of-care (POCT) detection (Yager et al 2008 Quantum dots (QDs) have been broadly used for biological labeling and imaging due to their unique optical properties, i.e., a broad excitation spectrum and a narrow and symmetric emission peak (Lu et al 2011;Medintz et al 2005;Zhou et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the type of detection target, these methods could be categorized into, for example, virus isolation and identification, nucleic acid-based detection, antigen detection, and antibody detection [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Most of these methods need demanding conditions and professional operations, and some of the detection processes is time-consuming.…”
Section: Open Access Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 To achieve specific binding of magnetic nanoparticles onto CRP, anti-CRP is covalently coated onto magnetic nanoparticles, which are stably dispersed in phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7.2). Under the action of multiple AC magnetic fields, individual magnetic nanoparticles dispersed in a reagent rotate in response to applied AC magnetic fields.…”
Section: Immunomagnetic Reduction Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take advantage of magnetic nanoparticles in clinical molecular assays, Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanoparticles conjugated with anti-CRP antibody can be used as labeling markers for detecting CRP. Meanwhile, the method referred to as immunomagnetic reduction (IMR), 11,12 a type of magnetically labeled immunoassay, is utilized to detect and quantify CRP levels through reduction of magnetic signals due to the association between magnetic nanoparticles and CRP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%