2019
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent Cochrane review on the use of basal insulin analogs compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes included 26 randomized controlled trials with 8,784 patients and had shown the following findings: insulin detemir lowered the risk of severe hypoglycemia compared to NPH insulin but this finding was not consistent; there was no difference in the incidence of severe hypoglycemia when comparing insulin glargine to NPH insulin; there was no difference in the occurrence of severe nocturnal hypoglycemia, glucose control, or quality of life when comparing insulin detemir or insulin glargine to NPH insulin; there were no differences in all those outcomes between children and adults. 23 In another systematic review that included 65 randomized and nonrandomized trials with 14,200 patients and was sponsored by the Canadian Health and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, the authors found benefits of using long-acting basal insulin analogs compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes in terms of reduction of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, weight gain, and the incidence of major, serious, or nocturnal hypoglycemia. 24 A more recent systematic review included 28 randomized controlled trials with 7,394 patients and had shown statistically significant improvement of glucose control with the long-acting basal insulins analog glargine but not insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin (mean reduction of HbA1c of 0.31% with insulin glargine and mean reduction of 0.25% with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin) and lower risk of severe hypoglycemia with basal insulin analogs.…”
Section: Type 1 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent Cochrane review on the use of basal insulin analogs compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes included 26 randomized controlled trials with 8,784 patients and had shown the following findings: insulin detemir lowered the risk of severe hypoglycemia compared to NPH insulin but this finding was not consistent; there was no difference in the incidence of severe hypoglycemia when comparing insulin glargine to NPH insulin; there was no difference in the occurrence of severe nocturnal hypoglycemia, glucose control, or quality of life when comparing insulin detemir or insulin glargine to NPH insulin; there were no differences in all those outcomes between children and adults. 23 In another systematic review that included 65 randomized and nonrandomized trials with 14,200 patients and was sponsored by the Canadian Health and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, the authors found benefits of using long-acting basal insulin analogs compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes in terms of reduction of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, weight gain, and the incidence of major, serious, or nocturnal hypoglycemia. 24 A more recent systematic review included 28 randomized controlled trials with 7,394 patients and had shown statistically significant improvement of glucose control with the long-acting basal insulins analog glargine but not insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin (mean reduction of HbA1c of 0.31% with insulin glargine and mean reduction of 0.25% with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin) and lower risk of severe hypoglycemia with basal insulin analogs.…”
Section: Type 1 Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Health Organization has recommended to the globe a “modern comprehensive therapy (quintet)” for diabetes, with diet control ranking first [ 19 ]. Therefore, functional factors that regulate blood sugar have become research hotspots in the field of diabetes prevention and treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Health Organization currently reports that there are 463 million diabetics worldwide and predicts the existence of 700 million diabetics by 2045 [3] . With the advent of insulin and the rational use of antibiotics, complications such as diabetic ketoacidosis, diabetic foot, and severe systemic infection have been greatly reduced [4][5][6] . However, diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic nephropathy (DN) and other diseases caused by diabetes have become major complications that seriously affect the quality of life of patients [7,8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%