2019
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography for interstitial lung disease using model-based iterative reconstruction with or without the lung setting

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of reconstruction on the image quality and quantitative analysis for interstitial lung disease (ILD) using filtered back projection (FBP) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) with the lung setting and the conventional setting on ultra-low-dose computed tomography (CT). Fifty-two patients with known ILD were prospectively enrolled and underwent CT at an ultra-low dose (0.18 ± 0.02 mSv) and a standard dose (7.01 ± 2.66 mSv). Ultra-low-dose CT … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ILA is ideally evaluated using a thin-section chest CT protocol reconstructed with thin sections (≤1.5 mm) and a high-spatial-frequency algorithm. Thin-section CT should be performed if the initial CT examination was performed without thin sections, using an ultra-low-dose protocol or using nonoptimal reconstruction methods such as soft-tissue setting and some iterative reconstructions that affect the image texture (72,73), that is, if the scan did not include all of the lungs (eg, abdominal CT) or if the identified abnormalities are equivocal for ILA. Prone CT scanning is often helpful in distinguishing dependent lung atelectasis from true ILA (74,75).…”
Section: Guidance For Radiologistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ILA is ideally evaluated using a thin-section chest CT protocol reconstructed with thin sections (≤1.5 mm) and a high-spatial-frequency algorithm. Thin-section CT should be performed if the initial CT examination was performed without thin sections, using an ultra-low-dose protocol or using nonoptimal reconstruction methods such as soft-tissue setting and some iterative reconstructions that affect the image texture (72,73), that is, if the scan did not include all of the lungs (eg, abdominal CT) or if the identified abnormalities are equivocal for ILA. Prone CT scanning is often helpful in distinguishing dependent lung atelectasis from true ILA (74,75).…”
Section: Guidance For Radiologistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to highlight that, in our study, only 5 of the 65 emphysema CT cases had been recorded on the radiographs. Currently, new technology has been developed allowing better visualisation of the interstitium using low-dose CT,38–40 which may facilitate using CT for the early diagnosis of pneumoconiosis with less concern about radiation exposure. However, the use of CT as a surveillance tool requires further studies to better assess its application, such as: what is the appropriate screening interval for the target population, risk–benefit analyses related to cumulative radiation doses, standardisation of image readings, availability of scanners and costs involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, low-dose CT for screening has been developed and validated in CTD-ILD [ 31 ]. Ultra-low dose CTs have been used for other lung diseases and with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology, it may become viable for CTD-ILD too [ 32 ]. Current quantitative CT (qCT) parameters can quantify lung involvement in SSc and differentiate it from IPF [ 33 ].…”
Section: Screening Monitoring and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%