Mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists such as morphine are extremely effective treatments for acute pain. In the setting of chronic pain, however, their long-term utility is limited by the development of tolerance and physical dependence. Drug companies have tried to overcome these problems by simply "dialing up" signal transduction at the receptor, designing more potent and efficacious agonists and more long-lasting formulations. Neither of these strategies has proven to be successful, however, because the net amount of signal transduction, particularly over extended periods of drug use, is a product of much more than the pharmacokinetic properties of potency, efficacy, half-life, and bioavailability, the mainstays of traditional pharmaceutical screening. Both the quantity and quality of signal transduction are influenced by many regulated processes, including receptor desensitization, trafficking, and oligomerization. Importantly, the efficiency with which an agonist first stimulates signal transduction is not necessarily related to the efficiency with which it stimulates these other processes. Here we describe recent findings that suggest MOR agonists with diminished propensity to cause tolerance and dependence can be identified by screening drugs for the ability to induce MOR desensitization, endocytosis, and recycling. We also discuss preliminary evidence that heteromers of the delta opioid receptor and the MOR are pronociceptive, and that drugs that spare such heteromers may also induce reduced tolerance.Opioids have been used to treat pain for well over 5,000 years. 1 Before the 19th century, the drug of choice was opium, the resin released from the seed pods of the opium poppy. The potency of opium varied greatly from batch to batch, making it impossible to standardize dosage and greatly increasing the risk of overdose. The purification of morphine from opium in 1803 finally solved this problem and greatly improved the safety of using opioids; however, once drug doses were easily quantifiable, the problem of tolerance, defined as the need for higher doses of drug to achieve the same effect, became increasingly apparent. Tolerance was frequently accompanied by physical dependence, the need for continued drug use to prevent somatic and affective withdrawal symptoms, and in some cases by addiction.Scientists have assumed, or at least hoped, that the biological mechanisms mediating opioid analgesia are distinct from, and can be divorced from, those mediating tolerance, dependence, and addiction, and from the time of morphine's discovery, they have tried to develop opioids with a reduced propensity to cause these negative sequelae of prolonged opioid use. Two hundred years later, however, morphine is still a mainstay of modern pain management, and Many attempts to develop a better opioid have been based on flawed or incomplete hypotheses of tolerance development. As a case in point, both heroin and sustained release oxycodone (trade name OxyContin), today 2 of the most highly sought after opioid drugs of ...