2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2009.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-low-frequency (ULF) and total electron content (TEC) anomalies observed at Agra and their association with regional earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of ULF electromagnetic fields aims to equip seismic stations, in the south of Iberian Peninsula with threecomponent ULF magnetometers of type LEMI-30 (produced by the Lviv Centre of Space Research, Ukraine) as commonly used in ULF research, Chauhan et al (2009). A possible location for the initial two equipments is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Observation Of Ulf Magnetic Field Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection of ULF electromagnetic fields aims to equip seismic stations, in the south of Iberian Peninsula with threecomponent ULF magnetometers of type LEMI-30 (produced by the Lviv Centre of Space Research, Ukraine) as commonly used in ULF research, Chauhan et al (2009). A possible location for the initial two equipments is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Observation Of Ulf Magnetic Field Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that low-frequency (ultra (ULF), very (VLF), and low-frequency (LF)) electromagnetic waves produce more convincing earthquake precursors (compared to higher frequencies) because of less contamination, large skin depth, and low attenuation, Chauhan et al (2009). Thus, two seismo-electromagnetic phenomena (SEM) will be considered: ULF electromagnetic field emissions, Telesca et al (2008), and VLF/LF radio broadcastings, Biagi et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although individual seismo-electromagnetic parameters have shown their success to identify precursors, a considerable amount of false seismogenic anomalies are presumably due to other geophysical phenomena and local interferences. Therefore monitoring of different electromagnetic parameters has been proposed recently to enhance the success rate of identifying seismogenic anomalies [16] [17] [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The features that are important in all sensing methods are low power consumption, low price, being unaffected by environmental changes, high precision, high reliability and stability. Some remote sensing methods used from past to present include electromagnetic induction (EMI) [1][2][3][4][5], ground effect radar (GPR) [6][7][8][9][10][11] and magnetic anomaly [12][13][14][15]18]. Magnetic anomaly is the most widely used remote sensing method due to its low price, low number of equipment and changeable sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%