2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04916-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-processed food consumption associates with higher cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, three studies reported no association between ultraprocessed food consumption and BMI (beta coefficient: 0.02; 95%CI, −0.02 to 0.07 39 ; Spearman correlation coefficient: −0.12, P = 0.78 48 ; Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.04, P = 0.95 47 ), with two of these reporting no association with waist circumference (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.01, P = 0.90 48 ; Pearson correlation coefficient 0.025, P = 0.75 47 ). Similarly, two studies reported that higher versus lower consumption of ultraprocessed food was not associated with body fat percentage (beta coefficient: 0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.12 71 ; Pearson correlation coefficient −0.45, P = 0.57 47 ) or visceral fat (beta coefficient: 0.20; 95% CI, −4.11 to 4.51 71 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, three studies reported no association between ultraprocessed food consumption and BMI (beta coefficient: 0.02; 95%CI, −0.02 to 0.07 39 ; Spearman correlation coefficient: −0.12, P = 0.78 48 ; Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.04, P = 0.95 47 ), with two of these reporting no association with waist circumference (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.01, P = 0.90 48 ; Pearson correlation coefficient 0.025, P = 0.75 47 ). Similarly, two studies reported that higher versus lower consumption of ultraprocessed food was not associated with body fat percentage (beta coefficient: 0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.12 71 ; Pearson correlation coefficient −0.45, P = 0.57 47 ) or visceral fat (beta coefficient: 0.20; 95% CI, −4.11 to 4.51 71 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Five studies used sex‐specific cut‐off ranges, four divided the sample by quartiles 49,65,66,68 and the other study by tertiles 42 . Other studies treated ultraprocessed food consumption as a dichotomous variable ( n = 5) 66,68‐71 as well as a continuous variable ( n = 7 for main statistical analyses, 39,41,47,48,55,58,71 with n = 10 for secondary analyses 36,49,51‐53,59,65,67,68 ). In the latter, quartiles or quintiles were used for the main statistical analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations