2021
DOI: 10.1063/4.0000120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafast lattice dynamics and electron–phonon coupling in platinum extracted with a global fitting approach for time-resolved polycrystalline diffraction data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter was estimated to be only about 2 K for an excitation density of 2.8 × 10 19 cm –3 (see Supporting Information). Thermal heating leads to an intensity decrease of all Bragg peaks as per the Debye–Waller effect; see for instance ref . Such a response is clearly not observed here for peaks 1, 2, and 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…The latter was estimated to be only about 2 K for an excitation density of 2.8 × 10 19 cm –3 (see Supporting Information). Thermal heating leads to an intensity decrease of all Bragg peaks as per the Debye–Waller effect; see for instance ref . Such a response is clearly not observed here for peaks 1, 2, and 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Instead, it becomes necessary in aluminum to separately account for the partial electron–phonon coupling to investigate the energy flow evolution. However, it seems the findings in aluminum cannot be generalized easily as further femtosecond electron diffraction experiments show different results [ 39 , 40 , 43 ]. Thus, accurate electron–phonon coupling factors for a wide variety of elements and materials are in high demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a magnetic insulator, laser‐excited hot electrons in the metal layer (Pt) get spin‐polarized upon scattering off the interface toward the magnetic insulator. [ 57 ] In α ‐Fe 2 O 3 /Pt, the electronic temperature of the Pt layer increases by Δ T Pt (t) upon laser excitation, [ 58,59 ] while that of the α ‐Fe 2 O 3 layer remains unaffected because of the weak absorption. [ 60 ] Therefore, the ultrafast‐SSE spin current injected from the α ‐Fe 2 O 3 to the Pt layer can be expressed as the temporal convolution Jynormals,normalΔnormalT0.33em(t)=(κyPt*ΔTPt)0.33em(t)${J}_{y}^{\mathrm{s},{\Delta}\mathrm{T}}\ (t)=({\kappa}_{y}^{\mathrm{Pt}}\ast {\Delta}{T}^{\mathrm{Pt}})\ (t)$, with κyPt(t)$\kappa _y^{{\rm{Pt}}}( t )$ being the response function that relates the spin current in the Pt layer to an ultrashort δ ‐like temperature increase of the Pt electrons.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%