2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.594-595.281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrafiltration Formulation of Cellulose Acetate / Polysulfone Blended Membrane

Abstract: Membrane has been used widely in developed countries and most of researchers focus on the development of membrane formulation. However, different materials with different portion give a various effects on the membrane morphology and performances. Hence, blend polymer is one of the method that can be explored to produce the best membrane performance. This present study aims to identify an ideal formulation of blend polymers in membrane fabrication process. Dope solution was prepared using these materials; cellu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…188 Although neat CA and modified CA membranes are common polymers employed for the fabrication of porous polymeric membranes, they possess several disadvantages such as lower mechanical and thermal stability and lower susceptibility to chemical and microbial attack. 195 To solve these issues, researchers have been trying to introduce new CA membranes blended with other miscible polymers (polyvinylchloride, polysulfone, polyurethane, and polyethylene oxide) 103,199,200 or the addition of nanofillers such as hydroxyapatite, layered clays, andlayered double hydroxides (LDHs) 201,202 shown in Table 6. Laura et al fabricated a cellulose acetate-based membrane modified with block co-polymer poly(4-vinylpyridine-b-ethylene oxide) (P4VP-b-PEO) for the adsorption of several electrondeficient EDPs.…”
Section: The Removal Of Contaminants By Adsorption Occurs When Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…188 Although neat CA and modified CA membranes are common polymers employed for the fabrication of porous polymeric membranes, they possess several disadvantages such as lower mechanical and thermal stability and lower susceptibility to chemical and microbial attack. 195 To solve these issues, researchers have been trying to introduce new CA membranes blended with other miscible polymers (polyvinylchloride, polysulfone, polyurethane, and polyethylene oxide) 103,199,200 or the addition of nanofillers such as hydroxyapatite, layered clays, andlayered double hydroxides (LDHs) 201,202 shown in Table 6. Laura et al fabricated a cellulose acetate-based membrane modified with block co-polymer poly(4-vinylpyridine-b-ethylene oxide) (P4VP-b-PEO) for the adsorption of several electrondeficient EDPs.…”
Section: The Removal Of Contaminants By Adsorption Occurs When Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 The first is the addition of hydrophilic or organic materials, such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) 34 or with certain minerals, such as zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), 35 the second corresponds to a coating with hydrophilic polymers, 36 and the third class describes grafting with hydrophilic polymers or monomers. [37][38][39] Abdullah et al 23 studied mixtures of cellulose acetate (CA) and polysulfone (PSf) dissolved in N,Ndimethylacetamide (DMAc) as a solvent and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as an additive. The highest flow rate was observed for the mixture CA/PSf: 75/25 of 9.93 L/m 2 h, while the lowest flux was recorded for the membrane CA/PSf: 100/0, of 7.16 L/m 2 h. The rejection of the salt (NaCl) also increased with the decrease of the CA composition in the mixed polymer.…”
Section: A Review On Ca/psf Membranes For Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best performance was obtained for the following formula: 25% PSf 7.5% PVP and 75% CA. 37 M. Sivakumar et al 40 noted that the increase in the polysulfone content in CA-PSf mixtures resulted in an increase in the flow of pure water and in the water content. The rejection of the BSA was higher, compared to a smaller flow.…”
Section: A Review On Ca/psf Membranes For Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical method, using strong acid hydrolysis, produces sizecontrolled fibrils with fractional removal of the amorphous sections of raw materials such as wood fibers and agricultural waste [7]. Whereas, the mechanical method includes a grinder process, a highpressure homogenizer and refiner treatment [11]. Cellulose fibrils extracted from cellulose pulp have much larger specific surface area, low density and higher stiffness compared with the inorganic particles [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%