2003
DOI: 10.1038/421599b
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrahard polycrystalline diamond from graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
374
3
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 714 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
15
374
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, Zarechnaya, et al [14] reported the hardness of 105 GPa to 58 GPa with 0.5 N-10 N loading forces, which is not consistent with the theoretical work [18]. The reported very hardness might duo to the nanosized nature, especially for the crystallite size of 10-15 nm is within the range of the "strongest size", such as Nano polycrystalline diamond [39] and Nano polycrystalline cubic boron nitride [40] . Furthermore, the radial crack length of Vickers indentation has been directly measured using optical microscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Secondly, Zarechnaya, et al [14] reported the hardness of 105 GPa to 58 GPa with 0.5 N-10 N loading forces, which is not consistent with the theoretical work [18]. The reported very hardness might duo to the nanosized nature, especially for the crystallite size of 10-15 nm is within the range of the "strongest size", such as Nano polycrystalline diamond [39] and Nano polycrystalline cubic boron nitride [40] . Furthermore, the radial crack length of Vickers indentation has been directly measured using optical microscopy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recent experiments have shown that nanocrystalline solids, such as BN [23] or diamond [24], possess hardness "higher" than bulk diamond. These observations contradicted the reversed Hall-Petch effect that the hardness and yield stress should decrease with the grain size.…”
Section: Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference can originate either from the carbon nitride network itself (it then should be more dense in our case), or the presence of hydrogen (which tends to decrease B values as mentioned by Horvath-Bordon [16], the hydrogen presence being not excluded in our case), or the nanometric size of our material. In this last case, it is difficult to predict if a bulk morphology for c-CN x should favor or not higher values of bulk modulus as both tendancies can be encountered in literature [32][33][34][35]. Moreover, the nanocomposite morphology (the nanosized cubic phase being embedded in an amorphous nanosized matrix) makes these predictions all the more difficult.…”
Section: Goglio Et Al Revised Version Submitted To Diamond and Relamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, nanocrystalline diamond produced by high-pressure high-temperature process appears as hard as (or even harder than) single-crystal diamond [35]. As, contrary to c-CN x , the amorphous matrix embedding the crystalline nanodomains is highly unstable, further works to isolate and disperse the nanoclusters deserve careful thought.…”
Section: Goglio Et Al Revised Version Submitted To Diamond and Relamentioning
confidence: 99%