2021
DOI: 10.1364/prj.444444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrahigh detectivity, high-speed and low-dark current AlGaN solar-blind heterojunction field-effect phototransistors realized using dual-float-photogating effect

Abstract: High detectivity is essential for solar-blind deep-ultraviolet (DUV) light detection because the DUV signal is extremely weak in most applications. In this work, we report ultrahigh-detectivity AlGaN-based solar-blind heterojunction-field-effect phototransistors fabricated utilizing dual-float-photogating effect. The p + - Al 0.4 GaN layer and Al … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific detectivity ( D * ) is one of the most significant parameters and reveals the capability to detect weak optical signals from the noise. It can be calculated by the noise equivalent power (NEP): , D * = A × B NEP , where A is the active area, B is the electrical bandwidth. Generally, the NEP of the device can be estimated according to the equation: ,,, NEP = 2 q I D R , where q is the electronic charge constant and I D is the dark current density, and then the specific detectivity D * was calculated to be 4.36 × 10 16 Jones at 2 V. However, this specific detectivity value was overestimated because it only considered the short noise, but the noise of PDs commonly includes shot noise, thermal noise, and flicker (1/ f ) noise. , In order to more precisely measure specific detectivity, it is crucial to take into account the contribution of flicker noise at low frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific detectivity ( D * ) is one of the most significant parameters and reveals the capability to detect weak optical signals from the noise. It can be calculated by the noise equivalent power (NEP): , D * = A × B NEP , where A is the active area, B is the electrical bandwidth. Generally, the NEP of the device can be estimated according to the equation: ,,, NEP = 2 q I D R , where q is the electronic charge constant and I D is the dark current density, and then the specific detectivity D * was calculated to be 4.36 × 10 16 Jones at 2 V. However, this specific detectivity value was overestimated because it only considered the short noise, but the noise of PDs commonly includes shot noise, thermal noise, and flicker (1/ f ) noise. , In order to more precisely measure specific detectivity, it is crucial to take into account the contribution of flicker noise at low frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be related to the floating gate effect introduced by the PEO layer, which changes the electric field and thus affects the doping process. [ 37 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be related to the floating gate effect introduced by the PEO layer, which changes the electric field and thus affects the doping process. [37] To investigate the effect of UV illumination on the polymer electrochemical transistors, an electrochemical cell was fabricated and tested as shown in Figure 4e. The results of cyclic voltammetry show that the oxidation potential of MEH-PPV decreased from 0.404 to 0.366 V under UV illumination (Figure 4f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where D * is spectral detectivity in Jones, A is active area of the device, and BW = 12.5 GHz is the measurement bandwidth as specified in [24] and [25] determined from Fig. From Table 1 we can see that the Pt intrinsic Al0.1Ga0.9N device exhibited better spectral responsivity than the Au intrinsic Al0.1Ga0.9N device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%