1994
DOI: 10.1016/0927-7757(93)02656-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasmall- and small-angle X-ray scattering of smectite clay suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
117
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
16
117
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the polyelectrolyte solutions remain liquid-like even at higher concentrations, the observed qualitative different behavior of the structure factors of Laponite may be considered as indicative of the sol-gel transition at higher concentrations. Notice that the val-ues of S M (q = 0) for the Laponite suspensions under considerations are smaller than 1 and decrease with increasing concentration in contrast to strong small q upturns which have been observed experimentally for clay suspensions in the gel phase [18,20,21,71,72,73,74,75], polyelectrolyte gels [76] and mixtures [77], polystyrenesulfonate ion exchange resins [78], and low ionic strength polyelectrolyte solutions [79,80,81]. These strong upturns signal strong concentration fluctuations indicative of aggregation, or spinodal instability reminiscent of the behaviour observed in recent computer simulations [82] and PRSIM integral equations [38] of mixtures of oppositely charged particles.…”
Section: A Static Scattering Experiments: Consistency Checkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the polyelectrolyte solutions remain liquid-like even at higher concentrations, the observed qualitative different behavior of the structure factors of Laponite may be considered as indicative of the sol-gel transition at higher concentrations. Notice that the val-ues of S M (q = 0) for the Laponite suspensions under considerations are smaller than 1 and decrease with increasing concentration in contrast to strong small q upturns which have been observed experimentally for clay suspensions in the gel phase [18,20,21,71,72,73,74,75], polyelectrolyte gels [76] and mixtures [77], polystyrenesulfonate ion exchange resins [78], and low ionic strength polyelectrolyte solutions [79,80,81]. These strong upturns signal strong concentration fluctuations indicative of aggregation, or spinodal instability reminiscent of the behaviour observed in recent computer simulations [82] and PRSIM integral equations [38] of mixtures of oppositely charged particles.…”
Section: A Static Scattering Experiments: Consistency Checkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Norrish 61 suggested that the repulsive force caused by interacting double layers was responsible for the gel structure. There have been signicant developments in the ability to study the structure of clay dispersions using techniques such as cryo-TEM, 80 ultra small angle X-ray scattering, 81 X-ray uorescence microscopy, 82 environmental scanning electron microscopy, 83 transmission X-ray microscopy, [84][85][86] and differential interference contrast microscopy. 87 This has led to some convergence of the views on the structure of clay gels.…”
Section: Sol-gel Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration effect is much more pronounced in montmorillonite systems, being observable even at a 1% clay concentration (Figure 2b). There is a broad hump on the 3% and 5% curves between q = 0.1 and 0.2 nm -~ which is usually believed to account for the structure factor maximum of a scattering system (Morvan et al, 1994). To show the concentration effect, the scattering curves of 0.5%, 1% and 2% were extrapolated to zero concentration by a linear Zimm plot.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have both theoretical and industrial significance. The thickness, interparticle spacing in hydrated states, and the influence of interparticle forces fall into the characterization length scale of SAXS and have been investigated by this method in the past (Hight et al, 1960(Hight et al, , 1962Taylor and Schmidt, 1969;Morvan et aL, 1994;Pignon et al, 1997;Saunders et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%