1985
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/18/2/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic absorption and velocity measurements at mW peak power level in the range 50-500 MHz with variable pathlength cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the MPI another biplanar resonator was employed for measurements between 1 and 3 MHz . In the frequency ranges from 7 to 30 MHz and 80 to 400 MHz a fixed path cell and a variable path length cell, respectively, were used at the MPI to determine α from the decay in the amplitude of pulse modulated waves through the sample. The former method again yields the attenuation coefficient relative to the reference, the latter allows for absolute α measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the MPI another biplanar resonator was employed for measurements between 1 and 3 MHz . In the frequency ranges from 7 to 30 MHz and 80 to 400 MHz a fixed path cell and a variable path length cell, respectively, were used at the MPI to determine α from the decay in the amplitude of pulse modulated waves through the sample. The former method again yields the attenuation coefficient relative to the reference, the latter allows for absolute α measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the classical absorption of water at 25 °C is given by B = 21.2 3 10 215 s 2 m 21 . 21,22 The classical absorption is only predominate at high frequency. At low frequency, chemical relaxation is predominant causing excess absorption.…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially at very high frequencies and at an increased insertion loss of the ultrasonic ensemble, the RF driving signal (exceeding the sonic signal sometimes by 120 dB) must be reduced at the receiver input by RF switches, by a balanced transformer, by a hybrid or by a circulator. Therefore most pulsed ultrasonic transmission devices now have two piezo-electric transducers, the first solely as a transmitter, the second as a receiver (Busch and Maier 1954, Heasell and Lamb 1956, Andreae et al 1958, Andreae and Joyce 1962, Siegert 1963, Hunter and Dardy 1964, Berdyev and Lezhnev 1966, Plass 1967/68, Davidovich et al 1972, Sperkach et al 1972, Eggers and Funck 1973, Tabuchi et al 1975, Sperkach and Shakhparonov 1975, Papadakis 1976, Lezhnev 1981, Uhlendorf et al 1985, Kaatze and Lautscham 1988, Kaatze et al 1988, 1993, 1995b, Challis et al 1990, 1991. A number of differential methods increased the resolution for attenuation and velocity increments (Carstensen and Schwan 1953, Carstensen 1954b, Busse 1969/70, Corsaro et al 1970, Peters 1973, Mitaku and Sakanishi 1977, Gavish et al 1983, Elias and Eden 1979, but new electronic achievements in amplitude resolution and data storage have reduced the need for such refinements.…”
Section: Principles Of Pulse Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…base plate of the cell and the other mirror is moved together with the movable piezo-electric transducer unit. Design and characteristics of variable-pathlength cells for the VHF range (Uhlendorf et al 1985, Kaatze et al 1988, for lower frequencies (Eggers et al 1981, Kaatze et al 1993) and for higher frequencies (Kaatze and Lautscham 1988, Kaatze et al 1995b) are described in the recent literature.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%