1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(98)00365-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic density sensor—analysis of errors due to thin layers of deposits on the sensor surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(9) any buffer material can be used to determine the density using the reflection coefficient. But, as shown in Table 1, only materials of acoustic impedance comparable to the impedance of the sample medium possess an acceptable sensitivity for small density variations Püttmer et al, 2000;Greenwood et al, 1999). The same holds true for the ARM; increasing angular difference to the normal incidence even decreases the RC difference.…”
Section: The Choice Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(9) any buffer material can be used to determine the density using the reflection coefficient. But, as shown in Table 1, only materials of acoustic impedance comparable to the impedance of the sample medium possess an acceptable sensitivity for small density variations Püttmer et al, 2000;Greenwood et al, 1999). The same holds true for the ARM; increasing angular difference to the normal incidence even decreases the RC difference.…”
Section: The Choice Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The RRM based on one pulse, as applied in McClements and Fairly (1991), Papadakis et al (1973), , Püttmer et al ( , 2000 and Saggin and Coupland (2001), uses the ratio of any detectable buffer reflection of a sample medium and the corresponding buffer reflection of a reference medium, e.g. A r1 (sample) and A r1 (reference):…”
Section: Reference Reflection Methods (Rrm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations