2009
DOI: 10.1080/09349840802610139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic Measurements of Pretreated Aluminium Joints Durability during Hot Cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have observed nearly 40% change in the dynamic moduli of epoxies associated with these exposures, 48 though an upper bound of 20% change relative to nominal values after cure is more commonly reported. 41,43,47,52 The density of epoxy adhesives typically tends to vary by \5% of initial values. [47][48][49][50] Individual properties of the adhesive layer in the FE model of Figure 8(a) were adjusted up to the above-mentioned bounds while keeping all other material properties the same.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Changes In the Properties Of The Adhesive Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have observed nearly 40% change in the dynamic moduli of epoxies associated with these exposures, 48 though an upper bound of 20% change relative to nominal values after cure is more commonly reported. 41,43,47,52 The density of epoxy adhesives typically tends to vary by \5% of initial values. [47][48][49][50] Individual properties of the adhesive layer in the FE model of Figure 8(a) were adjusted up to the above-mentioned bounds while keeping all other material properties the same.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Changes In the Properties Of The Adhesive Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these values, the theoretical frequencies of the other ZGV modes fit the measured Similar values for the longitudinal stiffness are found in the literature for aluminium/epoxy interface. [21,22] The ratio K T /K L equal to 0.11 is much lower that the values of 0.7 to 0.8 reported by Cantrell. [23] However this ratio is close to the value 0.16 measured by Guo et al , in the case of a film deposited on a steel substrate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%