2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic osteotomy as a new technique in craniomaxillofacial surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
48
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the justifications for the better performance of piezoelectric motors when the pain was evaluated, is due to these engines mechanism of action. The micrometer oscillations of the piezoelectric motor allows a more selective cutting of bone structures, which reduces unnecessary tissue damage, thereby reducing the episodes of pain [23,32]. A confounding factor that may have influenced the heterogeneity between the results of these studies may have been the surgical time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the justifications for the better performance of piezoelectric motors when the pain was evaluated, is due to these engines mechanism of action. The micrometer oscillations of the piezoelectric motor allows a more selective cutting of bone structures, which reduces unnecessary tissue damage, thereby reducing the episodes of pain [23,32]. A confounding factor that may have influenced the heterogeneity between the results of these studies may have been the surgical time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the reason to better results with the use of piezoelectric motors than rotary instruments is basically the same. The selective cutting of tissue can provide fewer trauma, with less release of inflammatory chemical mediators, thereby producing less pain and swelling than rotary instruments [32]. Another study showed a low rate of facial swelling, or even a lack of facial swelling in more than 70 % of the cases analyzed with the use of piezoelectric motors when compared with rotary instruments [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This instrument seems to offer several main advantages in oral and maxillo-facial surgery (Stübinger et al, 2005;Kotrikova et al, 2006;Beziat et al, 2007;Landes et al, 2008aLandes et al, , 2008bMaurer et al, 2008;Beziat et al, 2009;Gonzalez-Garcia et al, 2009;Gilles et al, 2013) such as: (1) minimal risk for soft tissue, which vibrates without fracture when in contact with the osteotome tip; (2) excellent visibility within the surgical field due to minimal bleeding and the cavitation effect removing osteotomic detritus; (3) precision and geometric cutting, due to the limited vibration amplitude and specific design of the osteotome; and (4) low acoustic and vibration impact. However, three main disadvantages have been reported: (1) dense bone cutting could take up to 4 times longer than a traditional rotary saw; (2) it is necessary to maintain a stock of tips; and (3) higher cost than mechanical osteotomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these characteristics have translated by authors into clinical and surgical results such as a reduction of intraoperative blood loss, more cutting precision, a longer operation duration mean time, a less incidence of postoperative swelling and haematoma, a lower incidence of nerve damage and a faster nerve recovery when impaired (Eggers et al, 2004;Beziat et al, 2007;Landes et al, 2008aLandes et al, , 2008bGonzalez-Garcia et al, 2009;PineiroAguillar et al, 2011;Gilles et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beziat et al 29 , utilizaron el sistema de ultrasonido en osteotomía segmentaria de maxila, osteotomía sagital de rama de mandíbula y osteotomía orbitaria; destacan que no existió daño en tejidos blandos del globo ocular y tampoco se observaron daños en la duramadre. Reportaron un aumento del tiempo quirúrgico en la osteotomía palatina y la osteotomía sagital de rama con el doble del tiempo utilizado en la osteotomía con sierra y brocas (de forma convencional); por otra parte, la recuperación de la sensibilidad del nervio alveolar inferior asociada a la OSRM fue mucho más rápida al compararla con los resultados de otros sujetos con la misma osteotomía pero con otras técnicas.…”
Section: Cirugía Craneofacialunclassified