2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2008.4543228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic relative positioning for multi-robot systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, small field of view (30 o ), low resolution (15 o ) and small range (10m) are some of the major drawbacks of this system. Infrared/ultrasound-based sensor suites have been shown in [23,22] to provide accurate relative range and bearing estimation in indoor flying platforms. However, they are not suitable sensors for outdoor MAVs due to their short working range.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, small field of view (30 o ), low resolution (15 o ) and small range (10m) are some of the major drawbacks of this system. Infrared/ultrasound-based sensor suites have been shown in [23,22] to provide accurate relative range and bearing estimation in indoor flying platforms. However, they are not suitable sensors for outdoor MAVs due to their short working range.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and bearing (10 • max.) measurements using Time-ofFlight (TOF) sensing (Shoval and Borenstein 2001;Rivard et al 2008). However, the refresh rate is relatively slow, up to 1.33 Hz for 10 robots, due to the slow propagation of the sound signal (Rivard et al 2008).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the developed 3-D sensor against the infrared based 2-D relative positioning sensor by Kemppainen et al (2006), shows that it is 200 times faster, has a maximum range that is 1.2 times longer, with an accuracy performance that is 1.2 times better for both range and bearing (comparison at 3 m range due to limited available data). Comparing the developed 3-D sensor against the ultrasonic based 2-D relative positioning sensor by Rivard et al (2008), shows that it is 75 times faster, has a maximum range that is 1.8 6 http://jfroberts.com/phd (Eye-bot hovering collision).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Relative Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…무선통신을 사용하면 에이전트의 위치를 쉽게 알 수 있도록 도와주지 만 실제 적용할 때 하드웨어는 점점 복잡해진다. 이를 극복 하기 위해 초음파 센서를 사용하여 로봇의 위치를 인식하 는 연구들이 진행되었다 [17,18]. 하지만, 이러한 연구들에서 는 다개체 로봇들을 필요에 따라 여러 가지 포메이션 형태 로 변경하는 것이 어려웠다.…”
unclassified