1966
DOI: 10.1039/j19660000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic studies of electrolyte solutions. Part II. Compressibilities of electrolytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For KF and NaClOi solutions there are only adiabatic compressibility data available at 20 °C. These have been converted to isothermal compressibilities at 20 °C according to the relationship given in ref 35. ß appears to vary very little, if at all, with temperature.36 '37 Limiting apparent molar volumes of the esters ( ") have been used for Vn in calculations of log 7n according to eq 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For KF and NaClOi solutions there are only adiabatic compressibility data available at 20 °C. These have been converted to isothermal compressibilities at 20 °C according to the relationship given in ref 35. ß appears to vary very little, if at all, with temperature.36 '37 Limiting apparent molar volumes of the esters ( ") have been used for Vn in calculations of log 7n according to eq 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also used the former results listed in the papers of Allam and Lee [12,13], who also employed the acoustic Pasynski method at 25 • C. The reason was the large number of simple electrolytes collected, resulting in reliable calculations Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As an example : the hydration numbers of KCl in water, as well as in waterÈdioxane mixed solvents, do not exceed 611,20 and hardly depend on the experimental method and the method of calculation (for instance, the classical Pasynski method for aqueous solutions of KCl yields the hydration number n h \ The di †erences in obtained by the two acoustic 5.4). 21 n s methods originates from slightly di †erent assumptions and are a good example of the well-known fact that any comparison of solvation numbers obtained by di †erent methods may be misleading.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%