2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic vocalization ratios reflect the influence of motivational state and amygdala lesions on different types of taste avoidance learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Males expressed 55 kHz calls in anticipation of Boost® and inhibited 55 kHz calls when the Boost® was devalued with LiCl. The expression of USVs is consistent with the literature on USVs in CTA [ 107 ] and our prediction. Increases in 55 kHz in the context previously paired with Boost® suggests animals are assigning a positive valuation to the hedonic stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Males expressed 55 kHz calls in anticipation of Boost® and inhibited 55 kHz calls when the Boost® was devalued with LiCl. The expression of USVs is consistent with the literature on USVs in CTA [ 107 ] and our prediction. Increases in 55 kHz in the context previously paired with Boost® suggests animals are assigning a positive valuation to the hedonic stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The amygdala is known to play a key role in the acquisition of fear [70] and the production of 22-kHz USV was found to be orchestrated by an interplay of several nuclei of the amygdala [71]. For example, the medial nucleus [72] as well as the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala [73] were reported to mediate 22-kHz USV during conditioned avoidance behavior. However, the central nucleus of the amygdala is widely believed to exert the most dramatic effects on 22-kHz USV production [71].…”
Section: Genotype Differences In Fear-related Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wright et al (2012) claimed that these discrepancies could be accounted for by differences in recording methods. The heterodyne method and frequency-divided acoustic signals method were used in most previous studies, but these methods suffer from lower reliability (Hamdani & White, 2011;Parsons, Boonman, & Obrist, 2000) than a spectrographic analysis of broadband signals used in the Wright et al (2012) study. Therefore, Wright et al (2012) suggested that prior results were unreliable due to variable recording methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%