Evolution of the House Mouse 2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139044547.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonic vocalizations in house mice:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(193 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dogs are also able to produce bi- and poly-phonations, including ultra-high frequencies [ 38 ], whose perception would benefit from an extended sensitivity in a broader range of frequencies. Moreover, as high frequencies are subjected to bigger attenuation [ 39 ], they can be heard only at a very close range; hence, they are used for short-range communication while avoiding eavesdropping from other group members. Sibiryakova and colleagues [ 38 ] investigated acoustical characteristics of whines in dogs and found ultra-high fundamental frequency that could reach 23 kHz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dogs are also able to produce bi- and poly-phonations, including ultra-high frequencies [ 38 ], whose perception would benefit from an extended sensitivity in a broader range of frequencies. Moreover, as high frequencies are subjected to bigger attenuation [ 39 ], they can be heard only at a very close range; hence, they are used for short-range communication while avoiding eavesdropping from other group members. Sibiryakova and colleagues [ 38 ] investigated acoustical characteristics of whines in dogs and found ultra-high fundamental frequency that could reach 23 kHz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because high frequencies have greater directionality, greater attenuation, greater scattering, and decreased localizability than low frequencies ( Musolf and Penn 2012 ), the ultra-high frequency (h0) can only be heard at close range. Dogs may be able to use the ultra-high frequency for private communication “tete-a-tete” with preferred pack members, just as Wilson and Hare (2004 , 2006 ) suggested for ultrasonic alarm calls of Richardson’s ground squirrels limiting receivers to close kin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these facts, it is expected that postnatal calcification of the laryngeal cartilages would improve the sound frequency in mammals. It should be noted that rats and mice also employ the ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) [ 53 ], but unlike laryngeally echolocating bats, they do not possess the superfast muscle in their larynx. Thus, the postnatal calcification dynamics of the laryngeal cartilages are predicted to be qualitatively deviated in laryngeally echolocating bats against mice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%