1956
DOI: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1956.02330290001001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonically Produced Changes in the Blood-Brain Barrier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuronal damage with BBB opening induced by ultrasound at or near ablation intensities was initially reported in some studies (Bakay et al 1956 ;Ballantine et al 1960 ;Patrick et al 1990 ) but not in others (Vykhodtseva et al 1995 ). After reducing the acoustic intensity and duty cycle, BBB opening was still observed, but macroscopic damage was avoided (Mesiwala et al 2002 ).…”
Section: Bbb Opening Using Fus and Microbubblesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Neuronal damage with BBB opening induced by ultrasound at or near ablation intensities was initially reported in some studies (Bakay et al 1956 ;Ballantine et al 1960 ;Patrick et al 1990 ) but not in others (Vykhodtseva et al 1995 ). After reducing the acoustic intensity and duty cycle, BBB opening was still observed, but macroscopic damage was avoided (Mesiwala et al 2002 ).…”
Section: Bbb Opening Using Fus and Microbubblesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although they concluded that, given their configuration, it was not possible to produce permanent changes in the brain without undesired damage, they speculated that modifications such as removal of the skull bone and use of multiple focused beams could make such treatment possible. Ensuing investigations, performed after craniotomy, indicated the ability to produce discrete deep lesions in the brain [3][4][5][6][7][8] as well as an ability to open the blood-brain barrier [9] in a targeted region.…”
Section: Early Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant attention has recently focused on the ability of ultrasound to temporarily open the bloodbrain barrier (Figure 6), providing a means for spatially targeted and time-windowed passage of therapeutic agents into the brain. It has long been recognized that ultrasound can disrupt the bloodbrain barrier [9] but the prospect of creating a controlled reversible process [80], introduces significant promise for delivering agents that currently cannot be delivered into the brain. Furthermore, the prospect of targeting may protect certain areas in the brain while providing benefit to the target.…”
Section: Future Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found that 'Histological examination of lesions stained by trypan blue showed this method to be a reliable index of the area of tissue damage.' In this same connexion Bakay et al (1956) state that 'The lesion area does not seem to change in size during the first few days after irradiation. There is evidence of an additional zone of edema showing faint blue discolouration during the first two hours.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…After irradiation the wound was closed and 5-0 ml. of 2 % solution of trypan blue in 0-45 % saline was administered by slow intravenous injection to demarcate the areas of destruction (Bakay, Hueter, Ballantine & Sosa, 1956). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%