2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2001.tb01239.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonics in Evaluating Rheological Properties of Dough From Different Wheat Varieties and During Ageing

Abstract: The utility of low‐frequency ultrasonics in evaluating the viscoelastic properties of dough from different biscuit wheat flour qualities was studied. No distinct correlation was found between the ultrasonic characteristic (ultrasound velocity, v) and the rheological characteristics storage modulus, G' (r=0.43), or loss modulus, G″ (r=0.61), when a constant amount of water was added to the dough. Fairly high correlations were obtained between the ultrasound velocity, v, and the rheological measurements G' (r=0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from these results that the magnitude of the ultrasonic velocity for the stronger variety (Glenlea) is higher than the weaker one (Fielder) by about 1,000 m/s. Differences in ultrasonic velocity at this frequency for dough samples (rather than wet gluten) have previously been reported [22], with velocities in doughs prepared from harder wheats being greater than those from softer wheats (although differences in velocity were not as pronounced as those reported for gluten samples here). It should also be noted that as the treatment of the gluten was changed so did the magnitude of the ultrasonic velocity, indicating that both NaCl concentration and the cooking process influence the gluten structure that is monitored by the ultrasonic signal propagation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 36%
“…It is clear from these results that the magnitude of the ultrasonic velocity for the stronger variety (Glenlea) is higher than the weaker one (Fielder) by about 1,000 m/s. Differences in ultrasonic velocity at this frequency for dough samples (rather than wet gluten) have previously been reported [22], with velocities in doughs prepared from harder wheats being greater than those from softer wheats (although differences in velocity were not as pronounced as those reported for gluten samples here). It should also be noted that as the treatment of the gluten was changed so did the magnitude of the ultrasonic velocity, indicating that both NaCl concentration and the cooking process influence the gluten structure that is monitored by the ultrasonic signal propagation.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 36%
“…Various research reports have shown that low intensity ultrasonic techniques are sensitive to changes in the mechanical properties of dough due to the entrainment of gas bubble populations varying in size distribution, the use of varying formula levels of water, as well as salts (Létang, Piau, Verdier, & Lefebvre, 2001;Elmehdi, Page, & Scanlon, 2004;Leroy et al, 2008). However, attempts to use ultrasound to discriminate doughs made from different wheat cultivars have shown mixed degrees of success (Alava et al, 2007;Garcia-Alvarez et al, 2006;Kidmose, Pedersen, & Nielsen, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the same reports have shown that the gas fraction of dough makes difficult to delineate the role played by the dough matrix alone (independently of the gas void fraction) to the overall mechanical properties. Since gas bubbles affect dough mechanical strength (Bellido, 2007;Elmehdi, 2001), it is necessary to account for them in ultrasonic calculations of rheological properties, otherwise ultrasonic characterization of doughs cannot be regarded as unambiguous (Alava et al, 2007;GarciaAlvarez et al, 2006;Kidmose et al, 2001). Since gas bubbles are not central to the texture and quality attributes of noodle doughs it follows that ultrasound may be well suited for studying the textural characteristics of YAN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations