Summaryobjective To evaluate the impact of seven rounds of mass administration of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and ivermectin on the prevalence of chronic lymphatic filariasis and to compare it with that observed in a placebo arm in a community-level trial.methods Cross-sectional clinical surveys were carried out before and after seven rounds of mass drug administration (MDA). About 54-75% of the target population were treated at each round of MDA.results After seven rounds, the hydrocele prevalence had declined from the pre-intervention level of 20.5-5.1% (P < 0.05) in the DEC arm, from 23.9% to 10.4% (P < 0.05) in the ivermectin arm and from 20.4% to 10.9% (P < 0.05) in the placebo arm, equivalent to reductions of 75.3%, 56.6% and 46.6%, respectively. The lymphoedema ⁄ elephantiasis prevalence declined only marginally and without statistical significance from 3.7% to 3.2%, 4.6% to 3.9% and 2.9% to 2.3% in the DEC, ivermectin and placebo arm. After the seventh MDA, none of the sampled people in the 0-20 age group was found with hydrocele and there was a statistically significant decline in hydrocele prevalence in all other age groups in the communities treated with DEC, the drug known to have macrofilaricidal effect. The impact was relatively less in ivermectin arm.conclusion Repeated DEC administration has the potential to prevent incidence of new hydrocele cases and may resolve the manifestation at least in a proportion of affected people. Apart from reducing the microfilaraemia prevalence and transmission of infection, MDA also results in significant public health benefits by reducing the burden of hydrocele in treated communities.