2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonographic Quantification of Intrinsic Hand Muscle Cross-Sectional Area; Reliability and Validity for Predicting Muscle Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our study results show that muscle thickness is strongly correlated with clinical measures and disability scales and with electrophysiological findings in a wide spectrum of neuromuscular disorders. These findings are also in line with previous findings in studies, showing strong correlations between muscle thickness and strength, clinical scales, and electrophysiological findings …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, our study results show that muscle thickness is strongly correlated with clinical measures and disability scales and with electrophysiological findings in a wide spectrum of neuromuscular disorders. These findings are also in line with previous findings in studies, showing strong correlations between muscle thickness and strength, clinical scales, and electrophysiological findings …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Considering the upper limb, supraspinatus muscle thickness has been associated with subacromial impingement syndrome [3]. Ultrasound may be considered as a valid and reliable technique to assess the CSA of intrinsic hand muscles and could be useful to predict muscle strength in patients with nerve injuries [4]. Regarding the lower limb, a recent study found decreased thickness in the vastus medialis muscle in patients with knee osteoarthritis [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During US examination, the third examiner (US technician with > 500 US examinations at the beginning of the study) measured the cross‐sectional area (CSA) of the FDI muscle in cm 2 by positioning the US probe in the middle of the second metacarpal bone perpendicular to it . He also measured the ulnar nerve CSA in mm 2 at the wrist, at each of 6 markers across the elbow, and additionally at 1 cm and 3 cm distal to the ME (D1 and D3) to localize the lesion under the humeroulnar aponeurosis more precisely in all UNE distal to the ME.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%