2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-013-0154-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonographic visceral fat thickness in the first trimester can predict metabolic syndrome and gestational diabetes mellitus

Abstract: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether ultrasonographic visceral fat thickness measurement in the early gestational period is useful for predicting the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and metabolic syndrome (MS). The visceral fat thickness and subcutaneous fat thickness were measured via ultrasound at the first prenatal visit. The correlation between visceral and subcutaneous fat thickness and MS parameters, such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, and insulin resistance, was assessed. We a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
79
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interpretation of previous data was largely hindered by the cross-sectional design of central obesity measurement at the time of GDM diagnosis and also limited data on WHR (40). Our findings are consistent with a few small-scale studies including 10–45 GDM cases, which linked ultrasonography measured visceral fat in early pregnancy to impaired glucose tolerance or GDM in the third trimester (12, 41). However, these studies were not able to examine the joint association and incremental predictive value of visceral fat beyond a combination of established risk factors for GDM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interpretation of previous data was largely hindered by the cross-sectional design of central obesity measurement at the time of GDM diagnosis and also limited data on WHR (40). Our findings are consistent with a few small-scale studies including 10–45 GDM cases, which linked ultrasonography measured visceral fat in early pregnancy to impaired glucose tolerance or GDM in the third trimester (12, 41). However, these studies were not able to examine the joint association and incremental predictive value of visceral fat beyond a combination of established risk factors for GDM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, evidence has been largely confined to non-pregnant individuals. Data on the association between central obesity in early pregnancy and risk of GDM beyond established risk factors including overall obesity as measured by BMI are limited, mostly in small-scale studies including 10–80 women with GDM (11, 12, 13, 14). In particular, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist circumference (WC) have been established as simple and less expensive surrogate measures of central obesity with high correlations with intra-abdominal or visceral fat mass (15, 16), whereas data on WHR or WC in early pregnancy in relation to GDM risk are scant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this has been shown to occur even independent of the BMI, which is so far the only adipogenic indicator/marker clinically considered in GDM screening/treatment but, on the other hand, hardly serves as a marker for visceral type of obesity. Reports have purposed that ultrasound could be a potential way of estimating the VAT and SAT risk factors in pregnancy [40][41][42]. In confirmation of the aforementioned observations, our data may point to a particular role visceral obesity might play in the etiopathogenesis of GDM, through altered/increased expression of inflammatory factors and/or further factors increasing insulin resistance through altered action in VAT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…They found that visceral adipose tissue depth above the upper quartile was associated with a positive GCT, whereas subcutaneous fat was not correlated. Similar results were reported by Gur et al ., who also noted that sonographic visceral fat was superior to waist circumference and BMI in predicting gestational diabetes.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%