Ultrasonography and fluoroscopy-guided insertion of chest ports

Dede, Doğan; Akmangit, İlkay; Yıldırım, Zeliha Nilgün; Sanverdi, Eser; Sayın, Bige

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.12.001

Cited by 43 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Image guidance virtually eliminates the risk of several complications reported with unguided placement: pneumothorax, hemothorax, hematoma attributed to arterial puncture, pericardial tamponade, air embolization, chylothorax, hydrothorax, nerve injury, arrhythmia, and catheter malposition (7,9). In the presented series, the technical success of image-guided catheterization were 100% in 48 patients, as in other radiologic series (4,5,7,15,18) whereas technical placement failure occurred in up to 10% of cases in the surgical series (8)(9)(10).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%

Image-Guided Subcutaneous Port Implantation in Patients with Malignant Diseases

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 51%

Image-Guided Subcutaneous Port Implantation in Patients with Malignant Diseases

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Included studies were carried out in 14 different geographical regions and countries: the USA (n=14) [7, 8, 11, 16, 19, 21-23, 38, 42, 48, 49, 51, 55], Germany (n=6) [33-35, 43, 57, 60], Italy (n=4) [3][4][5]20], Spain (n=4) [12,17,46,47], the Netherlands (n=4) [26,32,45,59], France (n=4) [15,31,36,37], Belgium (n=3) [10,24,44], Taiwan (n=3) [13,14,29], Turkey (n=3) [18,41,50], Europe (n=2) [6,28], Switzerland (n=2) [25,58], Brazil (n=2) [40,61], Japan (n=2) [1,54], Austria (n=1) [27], Canada (n=1) [9], Portugal (n=1) [2], and Sweden (n=1) [30]. Of the 57 publications, five involved multicenter studies [6,28,30,36,37].…”

Section: Characteristics Of Selected Articlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients

Goossens

Stas

Jérôme

et al. 2011

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Heterogeneity in the definitions used to describe device malfunction was evident. A broad range in the reported incidence of malfunction and in the kind of calculation and reporting methods was also found. Methodological quality of the studies was often poor. Standardization of definitions and accurate outcome measurement is needed. Calculation and report of malfunction incidence should be based on prospective data collected at the moment of an accession attempt.

show abstract

“…For stoppage of massive bleeding, it is extremely useful to place the balloon catheter close to the bleeding area during withdrawal of the inadvertently placed catheter and until insertion of the stent. Even when an evident extravasation is not viewable in scans, the inadvertently placed catheter may be compressing the area and stopping the bleeding 6,7) ; thus, the catheter should not be withdrawn until preparations are ready for carrying out the procedure in the angiography room. Above all, we recommend ultrasonographic-and fluoroscopic-guidance in the angiography room for the safe insertion of a vascular access catheter, especially for those with large diameters.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%