2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasonography of the scrotum: Revisiting a classic technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the true frequency of subcentimeter testicular tumours in that population was probably much higher. In light of the ever-growing clinical use of scrotal sonography in urologic practice and its ongoing technical refinements [ 8 , 9 , 34 , 35 ], the relative frequency of subcentimeter testicular tumours is probably in the range of 10% or more in contemporary series. This figure clearly underscores the clinical relevance of managing incidentally detected small testicular lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, the true frequency of subcentimeter testicular tumours in that population was probably much higher. In light of the ever-growing clinical use of scrotal sonography in urologic practice and its ongoing technical refinements [ 8 , 9 , 34 , 35 ], the relative frequency of subcentimeter testicular tumours is probably in the range of 10% or more in contemporary series. This figure clearly underscores the clinical relevance of managing incidentally detected small testicular lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of a testicular new growth is considered to have a bearing on histology found upon surgery [ 7 ]. This knowledge is of high clinical relevance, because in light of the continuously growing use of scrotal ultrasound in everyday urological practice and ongoing technical refinements of this technology [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], the incidence of small testicular neoplasms has been increasing in recent years. Tumour size also has a bearing on metastatic spread, at least in the subgroup of seminoma [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, ultrasound examination is the preferred choice for testicular masses. Despite its high sensitivity in the mass detection, it shows low specificity in distinguishing between benign and malignant masses, let alone other pathological subtypes ( 23 , 24 ). Furthermore, testicular biopsy is used in some centers but has not gained widespread acceptance because of narrow indications and concerns for tumor seeding along the biopsy tract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scrotal ultrasonography (US), with a combination of grayscale and color Doppler US, is the first-line imaging technique for the evaluation of testicular pathology, due to its low cost, wide availability, convenience, short examination time, lack of radiation exposure, and high diagnostic accuracy [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. This technique represents the initial imaging diagnostic tool for the confirmation of the presence of a testicular mass and for the evaluation of the contralateral testis, and is strongly recommended, even in the presence of a clinically evident testicular tumor [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, US has limitations related to the operator’s practice and clinical experience, along with its relatively small field of view and lack of adequate tissue characterization. Occasionally, scrotal US findings are equivocal or nonspecific, including indeterminate nature of a testicular mass, difficulties in delineating lesions’ location and/or extension, and discrepancies between US findings and clinical history [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 ]. Multiparametric US—including conventional US, contrast-enhanced US, and elastography—has significantly improved the diagnostic efficacy of the technique in the assessment of scrotal diseases [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%