2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound assessment of soft tissue augmentation around implants in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft and xenogeneic collagen matrix – 1-year randomised follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
102
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement of soft tissue changes over time is difficult when small alterations occur. In the past, different methods have been used including predominantly transmucosal probing, as well as ultrasonic devices [12,[37][38][39] and 2D measurements on CBCT slices [40,41]. The main disadvantage of these methods is that the data only pertain to one specific point of the implant site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of soft tissue changes over time is difficult when small alterations occur. In the past, different methods have been used including predominantly transmucosal probing, as well as ultrasonic devices [12,[37][38][39] and 2D measurements on CBCT slices [40,41]. The main disadvantage of these methods is that the data only pertain to one specific point of the implant site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Researchers have worked on fractures and cracked teeth, 3 caries detection, 4 periapical lesions, 5 alveolar ridge and maxillofacial bones structures, 6 temporomandibular joints, 7 and on the measurements of soft tissue of the oral cavity, in particular of the gingiva and the masseter muscle. [8][9][10][11][12] Furthermore, it is possible to use ultrasounds to examine pathological structures, such as neoplastic lesions of the mucosa, 13 but also to detect the implant-abutment connection or to assess the margin of the alveolar ridge and the clinical attachment level, which can be used to evaluate the probing depth of the gingival sulcus and biologic width. 14 Nowadays, there is an increasing interest in evaluating the quality of the gingival margin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different non-invasive methods of phenotype assessment were performed, the most commonly used in similar studies-gingival probe transparency [14,[17][18][19]27,28] and also less standard method-ultrasonic measurement [29][30][31] of an accurate thickness of gingival tissues. A comparison of both methods showed a signi cant correlation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%