2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from Nephelium lappaceum L. fruit peel using central composite face centered response surface design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The quadratic model of percentage of lignin reduction had a predicted and adjusted R 2 values of 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. The predicted R 2 value was in agreement with the adjusted R 2 value, since the difference between two values was less than 0.02, indicating that the model developed will be able to give a reasonably good estimate of the response of the system [20]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quadratic model of percentage of lignin reduction had a predicted and adjusted R 2 values of 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. The predicted R 2 value was in agreement with the adjusted R 2 value, since the difference between two values was less than 0.02, indicating that the model developed will be able to give a reasonably good estimate of the response of the system [20]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The coefficient of variance (CV) specifies the degree of precision for the treatments and expressed as percentage (%). The low values of CV% clearly indicated a very high degree of precision and a good reliability of the experimental values [20]. Percentage of lignin reduction resulted in a lower CV value of 1.92%, which showed that the model has high experimental reliability due to closeness of experimental and predicted values [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of developed model was analyzed statistically. Different statistical parameters such as determination coefficient (R 2 ), adjusted determination co-efficient ( 2 a R ), predicted determination co-efficient ( 2 p R ), co-efficient of variance (CV %), predicted error of sum of square (PRESS) and adequate precision were employed in this study to analyze the adequacy of the developed model [9]. All the statistical analysis was carried out with the help of Stat ease Design Expert 8.0.7.1 statistical software package (Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, USA).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of R 2 , adj‐R 2 and pre‐R 2 for astaxanthin efficiency were 0.996, 0.988 and 0.967, respectively, which exhibited a close agreement between the experimental and the theoretical values predicted by polynomial model (Prakash Maran et al . ). It indicated that the proposed regression model had adequately represented the real relationship among the parameters chosen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%