2023
DOI: 10.1007/s42979-023-01973-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-Based Ovarian Cysts Detection with Improved Machine-Learning Techniques and Stage Classification Using Enhanced Classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of the EGNNN-NPOA-PM-UI method is evaluated under performance metrics. The obtained results are analyzed with existing models, like ultrasound image examination utilizing DNN for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors (DNN-VGG16-ResNet50-MobileNet-PM-UI) [19], automatic ovarian tumor identification scheme depending on ensemble convolutional neural network, and ultrasound imaging (CNN-Grad-CAM-PM-UI) [20], adoption of radiomics and machine learning upgrades for the diagnostic processes of women with ovarian masses (SVM-PM-UI) [21], machine learning method used with gynecological ultrasound to forecast progression-free survival in ovarian tumor patients (LR-RFF-KNN-PM-UI) [22], a deep learning method for ovarian cyst identification and categorization (OCD-FCNN) using fuzzy convolutional neural network (FCNN-PM-UI) [23], ovarian cancer estimation from ovarian cysts depending upon TVUS under machine learning strategies (RF-KNN-XGBoost-PM-UI) [24], ultrasound-based ovarian cyst detection with improved machine-lLearning strategies and stage classification under enhanced classifiers (ANN-DC-SVM-PM-UI) [25] and ovarian cyst categorization utilizing deep reinforcement learning and Harris Hawks optimization (DQN-HHOA-PM-UI) [26], respectively. K-fold cross-validation is considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effectiveness of the EGNNN-NPOA-PM-UI method is evaluated under performance metrics. The obtained results are analyzed with existing models, like ultrasound image examination utilizing DNN for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors (DNN-VGG16-ResNet50-MobileNet-PM-UI) [19], automatic ovarian tumor identification scheme depending on ensemble convolutional neural network, and ultrasound imaging (CNN-Grad-CAM-PM-UI) [20], adoption of radiomics and machine learning upgrades for the diagnostic processes of women with ovarian masses (SVM-PM-UI) [21], machine learning method used with gynecological ultrasound to forecast progression-free survival in ovarian tumor patients (LR-RFF-KNN-PM-UI) [22], a deep learning method for ovarian cyst identification and categorization (OCD-FCNN) using fuzzy convolutional neural network (FCNN-PM-UI) [23], ovarian cancer estimation from ovarian cysts depending upon TVUS under machine learning strategies (RF-KNN-XGBoost-PM-UI) [24], ultrasound-based ovarian cyst detection with improved machine-lLearning strategies and stage classification under enhanced classifiers (ANN-DC-SVM-PM-UI) [25] and ovarian cyst categorization utilizing deep reinforcement learning and Harris Hawks optimization (DQN-HHOA-PM-UI) [26], respectively. K-fold cross-validation is considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 3-8 and Figure 4 depict the simulation results of the proposed EGNNN-NPOA-PM-UI method. Then the proposed EGNNN-NPOA-PM-UI method is likened with existing systems, namely, DNN-VGG16-ResNet50-MobileNet-PM-UI [19]; CNN-Grad-CAM-PM-UI [20]; SVM-PM-UI [21]; LR-RFF-KNN-PM-UI [22]; FCNN-PM-UI [23]; RF-KNN-XGBoost-PM-UI [24]; ANN-DC-SVM-PM-UI [25] and DQN-HHOA-PM-UI [26], respectively. Table 5 depicts the specificity analysis.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation