2022
DOI: 10.1002/acr.24779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound Classification of Finger Pulp Blood Flow in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: A Pilot Study

Abstract: Objectives: To define a semi-quantitative classification of FPBF and to evaluate whether this classification could be used to assess FPBF in healthy controls and in SSc patients.Methods: 30 controls and 86 SSc patients were consecutively included. A classification of FPBF including 5 grades (from grade 0 (No signal) to 4 (signal detected on the entire finger pulp, including the sub-epidermal vascular network) was evaluated. This classification was explored in basal conditions and after hand baths in hot and co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, these vascular effects were no longer seen at the next infusion ( 26 ). Several cappilarscopic and ultrasonographic tools could help to the clinical evaluation of DU healing, and Ultrasound classification of finger pulp blood flow was correlated with the risk of DU ( 30 , 31 ). We were unable to obtain the results of the vascular examinations, which could have strengthened our data on the benefit of prolonged use of iloprost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these vascular effects were no longer seen at the next infusion ( 26 ). Several cappilarscopic and ultrasonographic tools could help to the clinical evaluation of DU healing, and Ultrasound classification of finger pulp blood flow was correlated with the risk of DU ( 30 , 31 ). We were unable to obtain the results of the vascular examinations, which could have strengthened our data on the benefit of prolonged use of iloprost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%