Ultrasound Coded‐Excitation Imaging for Endoleak Detection After Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair

Abstract

ObjectivesSeveral imaging modalities have been suggested for surveillance after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in general and endoleak detection in specific. In the present project a coded excitation‐based ultrasound (B‐Flow) was investigated for endoleak detection after complex endovascular aortic repair.MethodsPatients post complex endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR or T/FEVAR) undergoing follow‐up appointments including ultrasonography of the aorta at a vascular and endovascular surgery outpatient center were included in the study. B‐Flow was compared with computed tomography angiography (CTA), Duplex ultrasound (DUS), and contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) regarding agreement and reliability for endoleak detection and characterization.ResultsIn total, 47 follow‐ups were included. They accumulated in a total of 149 imaging investigations. Endoleaks were discovered in 44.7% of B‐Flow studies and a majority of these endoleaks were classified as type II. Agreement between B‐Flow and other imaging modalities was good (>80.0%) in general. However, with B‐Flow 6 and 2 endoleaks would have been missed compared with CEUS and CTA, respectively. Regarding endoleak classification, B‐Flow had a strong agreement (94.5%) with CEUS in detected cases. Furthermore, in a limited subset analysis, imaging findings were externally validated using findings from angiography.ConclusionsUltrasonography allows for endoleak detection and characterization without an invasive procedure or the use of potentially nephrotoxic contrast medium and can reduce radiation exposure. While CEUS mitigates issues of radiation and nephrotoxicity it still requires the intravenous application of contrast enhancers. Ultrasound coded‐excitation imaging such as B‐Flow could therefore further simplify endoleak surveillance after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair.