2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.11.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound Does Not Detect Early Blood Loss in Healthy Volunteers Donating Blood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resnick et al, meanwhile, found no significant change in IVC size or IVCci in a study of 41 patients donating 500 ml blood [10]. This study used M-mode to measure the IVC 2 cm distal to the right atrial-caval junction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Resnick et al, meanwhile, found no significant change in IVC size or IVCci in a study of 41 patients donating 500 ml blood [10]. This study used M-mode to measure the IVC 2 cm distal to the right atrial-caval junction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This suggests that long axis should be the first-choice measurement for clinicians, and has not been reported previously. Other studies report that adequate longitudinal measurements were unobtainable from 7 to 11% of their participants, but it has rarely been reported in studies using transverse techniques [8,10]. As the IVC moves inferiorly with inspiration, it is also difficult to ensure that transverse measurements take place at a consistent position along the vessel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These observations are confirmed by the results in Figure 9, which illustrate that assessment of diameter variations along three distinct (moving) M-lines results in considerably different CIs. In the literature, there are non-univocal recommendations about where to perform the diameter measurement (Resnick et al 2011;Wallace et al 2010): this inhomogeneous behavior of the vessel is likely to contribute to the variability in assessments (Weekes et al 2012).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of functional hemodynamic monitoring is actively emerging, and despite early skepticism, evidence suggests that dynamic assessment of the change in venous diameter during the respiratory cycle offers a number of unique advantages over the static, single-measurement approach [1,42]. Although VCI is not without important limitations [44], there seems to be a reasonable correlation between sonographic and traditional markers of intravascular volume status (Table 2), especially when temporal trends are taken into consideration [6,40].…”
Section: Overview Of Ultrasound In Hemodynamic and Volume Status Assementioning
confidence: 99%