1988
DOI: 10.1016/0041-624x(88)90034-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-enhanced diffusion through isolated frog skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, one important question remains unanswered, that is, whether these previously obtained LFS results with excised skin as the skin model can be extrapolated to the in vivo skin case. In the past, both in vivo 6–12 and in vitro 13–18 sonophoresis studies have been reported in the literature. However, due to the different drug detection methods utilized (drug detection through radiolabeling in vitro versus drug detection through the measurement of the biological effect of drugs in vivo ), as well as due to the differences in the model permeants and in the animal species utilized, a direct comparison of the previous in vivo and in vitro sonophoresis results has not been possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, one important question remains unanswered, that is, whether these previously obtained LFS results with excised skin as the skin model can be extrapolated to the in vivo skin case. In the past, both in vivo 6–12 and in vitro 13–18 sonophoresis studies have been reported in the literature. However, due to the different drug detection methods utilized (drug detection through radiolabeling in vitro versus drug detection through the measurement of the biological effect of drugs in vivo ), as well as due to the differences in the model permeants and in the animal species utilized, a direct comparison of the previous in vivo and in vitro sonophoresis results has not been possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ultrasound for enhanced diffusion through isolated frog skin (Mortimer et al ., 1988), cellophane membranes (Lenart & Auslander, 1980) and for transdermal drug delivery (Mitragotri & Kost, 2004) has been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Streaming action reduces the concentration gradient in the immediate neighborhood of the membrane (32). The increase in the amount of materials diffused in the ultrasonic field is mainly due to acoustic microcurrents, which increase the velocity of the particles of the medium (33).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%