Cancer Theranostics 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-407722-5.00016-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound for Drug/Gene Delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, secondary forces attract particles such as ultrasound contrast agents (agents used to increase local drug diffusivity across biological membranes) such as Imagent, SonoVue, Optison etc. 94 …”
Section: Recent Advances In Physical Methods Of Permeation Enhancemen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, secondary forces attract particles such as ultrasound contrast agents (agents used to increase local drug diffusivity across biological membranes) such as Imagent, SonoVue, Optison etc. 94 …”
Section: Recent Advances In Physical Methods Of Permeation Enhancemen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the low contrast between organs or materials with similar echogenicities, such as the blood and the tissues surrounding the vasculature [2] , and the poor image quality arising from poorly vascularized tissues, such as tumours or regions with many small vessels with slow blood flow [3] . Clinically approved ultrasound contrast agents are microbubbles, which are comprised of a gaseous core and a thin, generally biocompatible shell, made of lipids, proteins, or polymers [4] , [5] . Due to their smaller sizes as compared to red blood cells (RBCs), microbubbles can traverse even the smallest capillaries, which aids in imaging these small blood vessels.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MI depends on the maximum value of peak negative pressure and the pulse center frequency of the ultrasound field, and can be used as a safety guide for ultrasound exposure to the body. For MIs <0.3, the acoustic amplitude is considered low, while MIs >0.3 and <0.7 may cause minor damage, and MIs >0.7 may have major bioeffects such as cavitation (Huang & McPherson, 2014;Sen, Tufekcioglu, & Koza, 2015). The mechanical effects on cells and tissues can elicit biological responses, one of which is the delivery of molecules across biological barriers.…”
Section: Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally occurring cavitation bubbles arise when ultrasound with MIs>0.7 is applied to spots with lower tensile strength that contain gas nuclei capable of supporting the cavitation process (Huang & McPherson, 2014). These nuclei are in the form of gas pockets, gas bubbles or interfacial gaseous voids located at water-solid interface, and are transformed into cavitation bubbles during the exposure to acoustic pressure (Mørch, 2015;Junru Wu & Nyborg, 2008).…”
Section: Natural Cavitationmentioning
confidence: 99%