2016
DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2016-0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound-guided Femoral Artery Access for Minimally Invasive Neuro-intervention and Risk Factors for Access Site Hematoma

Abstract: Although ultrasound (US) guidance for venous access is becoming the “standard of care” for preventing access site complications, its feasibility for arterial access has not been fully investigated, especially in the neuro-interventional population. We conducted the first prospective cohort study on US-guided femoral artery access during neuro-interventional procedure. This study included 64 consecutive patients who underwent US-guided femoral artery access through 66 arterial access sites for diagnostic and/or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A study by Kurisu et al about ultrasound guided femoral artery access for minimally invasive neurointervention and risk factors for access site hematoma reported that the number of attempts puncture in first pass success was 63.6%, and it did not contribute significantly to groin hematoma after the procedure with p=0.788, but, when they evaluated the relationship between catheter size and hematoma, they found that catheter size 6 Fr (21.2%) was a risk factor for hematoma formation with p=0.099. 16 This could happen because they also classified hematoma into very tiny with size less than 20 mm, meanwhile we did not use any classification for our hematoma and we only used manual evaluation that was based on qualitative measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A study by Kurisu et al about ultrasound guided femoral artery access for minimally invasive neurointervention and risk factors for access site hematoma reported that the number of attempts puncture in first pass success was 63.6%, and it did not contribute significantly to groin hematoma after the procedure with p=0.788, but, when they evaluated the relationship between catheter size and hematoma, they found that catheter size 6 Fr (21.2%) was a risk factor for hematoma formation with p=0.099. 16 This could happen because they also classified hematoma into very tiny with size less than 20 mm, meanwhile we did not use any classification for our hematoma and we only used manual evaluation that was based on qualitative measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systolic blood pressure more than 180 before the procedure was about the time more likely to develop groin complications compared to other categories. 16 Meanwhile, patients with chronic hypertension were more adapted than acute hypertension, Dumont reported that chronic hypertensive patients were 60% less likely to have vascular complications. 20 In this study we did not record pre-procedural blood pressure, that might be why we did not have similar results with previous study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An AVF following insertion of a double-catheter is rare but can cause serious problems. We would advocate for routine use of ultrasound-guided arterial punctures to minimise the risk of femoral AVF formation as well as other complications [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018) сообщают, что переход на трансрадиальный доступ позволил достоверно снизить частоту формирования забрюшинных гематом, при этом авторы отмечают, что, по их данным, развитие этого грозного осложнения независимо ассоциируется с 3-кратным увеличением летальности и 5-кратным увеличением частоты развития сердечно-сосудистых осложнений в 30-дневный срок [36]. Другие авторы считают рутинное использование УЗИ-навигации при пункции артерии, использование 21G игл для пункции, а также проведение пункции в «безопасной зоне» достаточными для снижения частоты встречаемости постпункционных проблем [37,38].…”
unclassified