Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access vs. the External Jugular Vein as the Initial Approach to the Patient with Difficult Vascular Access

Costantino, Thomas; Kirtz, Jeremy F.; Satz, Wayne A.

doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.02.004

Cited by 64 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…2 Extrajugular vein cannulation is an alternative approach but is obtainable in less than 50% of patients and usually necessitates the involvement of a physician. 3 This approach also usually requires the patient to tolerate supine or Trendelenburg positioning, which may be difficult for many patients.…”

Section: Introduction: Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity

Fields

Dean

Todman

et al. 2012

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introduction: Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity

Fields

Dean

Todman

et al. 2012

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In a prospective randomized study of patients with difficult venous access, defined as at least three failed attempts by nurses, US-guided peripheral line placement was superior to an external jugular vein approach, with initial success of 84% versus 50% respectively and an overall success of 89% versus 55% [15]. This method is a safe and effective alternative to central venous access in patients without visible or palpable peripheral veins requiring simple venous access, which is especially the case in many emergency department (ED) patients [11,16,17].…”

Section: Technique and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

US-guided peripheral vascular interventions, comments on the EFSUMB guidelines

Dietrich

Horn²,

Morf

et al. 2016

Med Ultrason

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peripheral venous as well as arterial punctures have traditionally been performed on the basis of designated anatomical landmarks. However, due to patients' individual anatomy and vessel pathology and depending on individual operators' skill, this landmark approach is associated with a significant failure rate and complication risk. This review comments on the evidence-based recommendations on ultrasound (US)-guided vascular access which have been published recently within the framework of Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS) of the European Federation of Societies for US in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) from a clinical practice point of view. Part 1 of the review had its focus on general aspects of USguidance and on central venous access, whereas part 2 refers to peripheral vascular access.

show abstract

“…Ensaio clínico randomizado, realizado com 60 pacientes adultos, detectou maiores taxas de sucesso na PVP-US (84%) em relação ao método tradicional (50%, p=0,006), a considerar todas as tentativas observadas. Para estes autores, melhores resultados para o número de tentativas e para o sucesso na primeira tentativa de PVP, guiada por ultrassonografia, também não ficaram demonstradas (23) .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Punção Venosa Periférica Guiada Por Ultrassonografia: Prevalência De Sucesso E Fatores Associados

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os fatores associados ao sucesso na primeira tentativa de punção venosa periférica guiada por ultrassonografia em adultos. Estudo transversal analítico em uma unidade de pronto atendimento na região sul do Brasil, entre 1º e 30 de abril de 2015. Os participantes foram submetidos à punção venosa periférica guiada por ultrassonografia. Foram incluídos 97 participantes. A razão de prevalência de sucesso foi 43% maior nas veias visíveis e 128% maior nas veias retilíneas. Não foi encontrada relação significativa entre as variáveis analisadas e a diminuição da prevalência de sucesso na primeira tentativa. A presença de veia retilínea e visível foi o principal fator associado ao sucesso na primeira tentativa. DESCRITORES: Enfermagem baseada em evidências; Tecnologia biomédica; Pesquisa em enfermagem clínica; Cateterismo periférico; Ultrassonografia.PUNÇÃO VENOSA PERIFÉRICA GUIADA POR ULTRASSONOGRAFIA:PREVALÊNCIA DE SUCESSO E FATORES ASSOCIADOS* ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERIPHERAL VENIPUNCTURE: PREVALENCE OF SUCCESS AND ASSOCIATED FACTORSABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to analyze factors associated with a successful first attempt to ultrasound-guided peripheral venipuncture in adults. An analytical cross-sectional study was carried out in an emergency care unit in the South region of Brazil in April 2015. The participants were submitted to ultrasound-guided peripheral venipuncture. Ninety-seven participants were included. The prevalence ratio of success was 43% higher in visible veins and 128% higher in rectilinear veins. No significant association was found between the variables analyzed and the reduction of the prevalence of success at the first attempt. No se encontró diferencia significativa entre las variables analizadas y la disminución de la prevalencia de éxito en el primer intento. La presencia de vena rectilínea y visible fue el principal factor asociado al éxito en el primero intento.

show abstract

Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access vs. the External Jugular Vein as the Initial Approach to the Patient with Difficult Vascular Access

Cited by 64 publications

References 8 publications

The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity

The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity

US-guided peripheral vascular interventions, comments on the EFSUMB guidelines

Punção Venosa Periférica Guiada Por Ultrassonografia: Prevalência De Sucesso E Fatores Associados

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About