2019
DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201911129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal abscesses

Abstract: Цель исследования-улучшение результатов хирургического лечения абсцессов брюшной полости различной локализации с помощью дренирования под УЗ-наведением. Материал и методы. Проанализировано 103 клинических наблюдения в период с 2012 по 2017 г., потребовавших чрескожного дренирования внутрибрюшных абсцессов под УЗ-наведением. Из исследования исключены пациенты, которым выполнено дренирование внутриорганных и забрюшинных абсцессов вследствие панкреонекроза. Результаты. Полностью выздоровел 101 (98%) из 103 пациен… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Because ultrasound imaging has the characteristics of accurately location, nature, relationship with adjacent blood vessels, low cost, and low infection rate, ultrasound-guided puncture drainage has become the most important and practical method for the clinical treatment of abdominal abscess. [8] However, Yao Liqin et al [9] pointed out through clinical analysis that conventional ultrasound cannot effectively show the necrotic area of abscess congestion and edema that has not yet liquefied, and the same conventional ultrasound cannot fully identify the real necrotic area inside the abdominal abscess. The reason may be that some of the abscesses are pus Fluid thickening may be weak to hypoechoic on color Doppler ultrasonography, or due to the use of antibiotics, the abscess is in a critical state that is neither liquefied nor difficult to absorb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because ultrasound imaging has the characteristics of accurately location, nature, relationship with adjacent blood vessels, low cost, and low infection rate, ultrasound-guided puncture drainage has become the most important and practical method for the clinical treatment of abdominal abscess. [8] However, Yao Liqin et al [9] pointed out through clinical analysis that conventional ultrasound cannot effectively show the necrotic area of abscess congestion and edema that has not yet liquefied, and the same conventional ultrasound cannot fully identify the real necrotic area inside the abdominal abscess. The reason may be that some of the abscesses are pus Fluid thickening may be weak to hypoechoic on color Doppler ultrasonography, or due to the use of antibiotics, the abscess is in a critical state that is neither liquefied nor difficult to absorb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years there are many results of successful surgical treatment of abdominal abscesses of various localizations, including the pancreas, by drainage under ultrasound or CT guidance (Jo, 2015;Lee, 2017;Rani, 2016;Yang, 2016). Shavrina et al (2019) 2019) didn't find significant difference in mortality (endoscopy 8.8% vs surgery 6.3%; P = .999), but complications rate was significantly higher in the surgery group (0.69 ± 1.03) compared with the endoscopy group (0.15 ± 0.44) (P = .007). Wang et al (2019) compare laparoscopic approach or an open surgical procedure, percutaneous catheter drainage and endoscopic drainage.…”
Section: Treatment Of Pancreatic Abscessmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…При такой хирургической тактике риск рецидива достаточно высок и составляет, по данным разных авторов, до 75,0 %, что требует повторного оперативного вмешательства [3,8,10,12,13]. В настоящее время для лечения абсцессов брюшной полости интенсивно внедряются пункционно-дренирующие методики под ультразвуковым контролем, так как они имеют существенные преимущества перед открытыми, классическими хирургическими методами [2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][11][12][13].…”
Section: актуальностьunclassified
“…Многократное УЗИ в сочетании с рациональной медикаментозной терапией в послеоперационном периоде минимизирует риск развития гнойных осложнений после аппендэктомии, а в случае их развития позволяет своевременно обнаружить. По данным некоторых авторов, время от появления первых признаков абсцесса до повторной операции без использования УЗИ составляет 12-16 дней по сравнению с 3-5 днями при использовании ультразвукового мониторинга [2,3,5,[8][9][10][11]13].…”
Section: актуальностьunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation