2019
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound is not associated with the presence of systemic autoimmunity or symptoms in individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract: ObjectiveTo identify whether musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) abnormalities are associated with specific phases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) development in individuals at risk of RA.MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study of individuals at risk of developing RA, namely first-degree relatives of patients with RA (RA-FDRs) without evidence of established rheumatic disease at inclusion. The inflammatory activity on MSUS was assessed according to a validated score (SONAR). Active MSUS was defined as a total B-m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if imaging is used to define IA that is not identifiable on examination (i.e., subclinical IA), that may change the approach to prevention where "treatable" IA is identified by imaging earlier than is possible by physical examination. While potentially beneficial, that approach could also lead to overtreatment, in particular because of the known high variability in interpreting images, and also because "synovitis" on imaging can be detected in symptom-free individuals from the general population (49,50). As such, it may be some time before the appropriate role of imaging is understood for use in defining the presence of current "actionable" disease in the absence of findings of IA on examination, as well as prediction and prevention in IA/RA.…”
Section: Paradigm Shift To Ra Prevention: Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if imaging is used to define IA that is not identifiable on examination (i.e., subclinical IA), that may change the approach to prevention where "treatable" IA is identified by imaging earlier than is possible by physical examination. While potentially beneficial, that approach could also lead to overtreatment, in particular because of the known high variability in interpreting images, and also because "synovitis" on imaging can be detected in symptom-free individuals from the general population (49,50). As such, it may be some time before the appropriate role of imaging is understood for use in defining the presence of current "actionable" disease in the absence of findings of IA on examination, as well as prediction and prevention in IA/RA.…”
Section: Paradigm Shift To Ra Prevention: Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power Doppler on ultrasound was associated with the presence of unclassified arthritis (ie, at least one swollen join at physical examination), but not with any of the other preclinical phases of RA, thus not supporting the indiscriminate use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in a screening strategy for RA in a population with a limited risk of developing RA. 67…”
Section: Findings To Date Musculoskeletal Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corollary is that US may not be as informative in lower-risk individuals who do not yet have imminent clinical arthritis. In line with this, a recent US study of 273 first-degree relatives of RA patients (FDRs), of whom only 8% were anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA)-positive, found no overall increase in US synovitis in this population [20]. Likewise, in the Amsterdam seropositive arthralgia cohort, whilst grey-scale synovitis was associated with progression to IA, intraarticular PD signal was infrequently identified and was not predictive of progression to IA [17].…”
Section: The Utility Of Ultrasound In Managing Individuals At-risk Ofmentioning
confidence: 85%