Ultrasound of Fetal Cardiac Function Changes in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension Syndrome

Abstract

Pregnancy-induced hypertension syndrome (PIH) is a common pregnancy syndrome that could cause varying degrees of maternal and fetal organic damage and even endanger their lives. This study aimed to investigate ultrasound of fetal cardiac function changes in PIH. Totally 40 cases of gestational hypertension admitted to Cangzhou Central Hospital between October 2018 and September 2019 were enrolled in the hypertension group, and 40 women with healthy pregnancies during the same period were assigned to the normal group. Ultrasound results showed that PIH was associated with a significantly higher fetal cardiac septal thickness, fetal left ventricular end-diastolic area and end-systolic area, fetal right ventricular end-diastolic area and end-systolic area, fetal left ventricular systolic fraction 1 (VSF1), fetal left ventricular systolic fraction 2 (VSF2), fetal right VSF1, and fetal right VSF2 versus healthy pregnancy. The PIH fetuses had significantly lower neonatal weights versus healthy fetuses. Newborns of hypertensive pregnancies have larger hearts, faster heart rates, increased cardiac contractility, and lower weights versus newborns of healthy pregnancies.

Retracted: Ultrasound of Fetal Cardiac Function Changes in Pregnancy‐Induced Hypertension Syndrome

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”