Ultrasound’s ‘window on the womb’ brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians’ experiences in Australia

Abstract

BackgroundObstetric ultrasound has become a significant tool in obstetric practice, however, it has been argued that its increasing use may have adverse implications for women’s reproductive freedom. This study aimed to explore Australian obstetricians’ experiences and views of the use of obstetric ultrasound both in relation to clinical management of complicated pregnancy, and in situations where maternal and fetal health interests conflict.MethodsA qualitative study was undertaken as part of the CROss-Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS). Interviews were held in November 2012 with 14 obstetricians working in obstetric care in Victoria, Australia. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.ResultsOne overall theme emerged from the analyses: The ethical challenge of balancing maternal and fetal health interests, built on four categories: First, Encountering maternal altruism’ described how pregnant women’s often ‘altruistic’ position in relation to the health and wellbeing of the fetus could create ethical challenges in obstetric management, particularly with an increasing imbalance between fetal benefits and maternal harms. Second, ‘Facing shifting attitudes due to visualisation and medico-technical advances’ illuminated views that ultrasound and other advances in care have contributed to a shift in what weight to give maternal versus fetal welfare, with increasing attention directed to the fetus. Third, ‘Guiding expectant parents in decision-making’ described the difficult task of facilitating informed decision-making in situations where maternal and fetal health interests were not aligned, or in situations characterised by uncertainty. Fourth, ‘Separating private from professional views’ illuminated divergent views on when the fetus can be regarded as a person. The narratives indicated that the fetus acquired more consideration in decision-making the further the gestation progressed. However, there was universal agreement that obstetricians could never act on fetal grounds without the pregnant woman’s consent.ConclusionsThis study suggests that medico-technical advances such as ultrasound have set the scene for increasing ethical dilemmas in obstetric practice. The obstetricians interviewed had experienced a shift in previously accepted views about what weight to give maternal versus fetal welfare. As fetal diagnostics and treatment continue to advance, how best to protect pregnant women’s right to autonomy requires careful consideration and further investigation.

A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives’ views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy

“…The results that pregnant women often would care more about potential problems for the fetus than they cared about potential problems that could affect themselves are in line with those of one of our previous studies involving Australian obstetricians. This previous study outlined that pregnancy management was particularly difficult in circumstances when the risk to the pregnant woman was high while at the same time fetal benefit would be unlikely [ 43 ].…”

Health professionals’ experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Vietnam: a regional, cross-sectional study

“…The study questionnaire was developed based on the results from the earlier qualitative studies performed in the CROCUS study 7 19–27. Sociodemographic characteristics, evaluation of self-reported skills in performing ultrasound, and questions about access to obstetric ultrasound and health professionals’ views on what may improve utilisation of ultrasound in Vietnam were included, among other items.…”

Key issues for participatory research in the design and implementation of humanitarian assistance: a scoping review

“…The search yielded two studies that we initially considered excluding. One study consulted and engaged with the community to inform the design of a Randomized-Controlled Trial (RCT) [ 29 ] which we identified as one of the first stages of participation. A second study did not have a precise health focus but related to health in that it focused on child protection where there were mental health implications for the participants [ 30 ].…”

“…Two studies aimed to design and implement a program to improve current health services available in the humanitarian setting [ 35–37 ]. A study in Uganda analysed data, obtained through collaborative approaches, to improve the understanding of how a local group for male rape victims became organized [ 38 ], and lastly a study conducted in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Chechnya aimed to consult with the community prior to finalizing an RCT [ 29 ].…”