2021
DOI: 10.1109/jtehm.2021.3124937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound Sample Entropy Imaging: A New Approach for Evaluating Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that there are other kinds of entropy measures in addition to the Shannon, Renyi, and Tsallis entropy methods. In our previous work [34], we introduced ultrasound sample entropy imaging for liver tissue characterizations. Unlike the Shannon entropy based on probability or PDF estimations by conventional histogram-based or proposed KDE-based methods, sample entropy was determined by the dimension parameter, m, and the tolerance parameter, r [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that there are other kinds of entropy measures in addition to the Shannon, Renyi, and Tsallis entropy methods. In our previous work [34], we introduced ultrasound sample entropy imaging for liver tissue characterizations. Unlike the Shannon entropy based on probability or PDF estimations by conventional histogram-based or proposed KDE-based methods, sample entropy was determined by the dimension parameter, m, and the tolerance parameter, r [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work [34], we introduced ultrasound sample entropy imaging for liver tissue characterizations. Unlike the Shannon entropy based on probability or PDF estimations by conventional histogram-based or proposed KDE-based methods, sample entropy was determined by the dimension parameter, m, and the tolerance parameter, r [34]. The drawback of the sample entropy method lies in the fact that the two critical parameters, m and r, should be set empirically or experimentally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%