INTRODUCTIONStudies of small bowel (SB) mucosa in cirrhosis and portal hypertension report a diverse spectrum of histological abnormalities [1][2][3][4][5] . These include increased capillary angiogenesis, mucosal edema, decreased villus to crypt ratio, villus atrophy and decreased total absorptive surface. Villus abnormalities resemble the abnormalities of coeliac disease (CD) and this may affect the interpretation of small bowel biopsy, and lead to confusion when CD is to be excluded in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.The diagnosis of CD is increasingly considered and work up recommended during the evaluation of abnormal liver enzymes [6][7] . This is in part due to the heightened awareness of the association of CD with a variety of liver disorders. Most commonly described associated liver disorders include autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, unexplained abnormal liver tests and cirrhosis [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . The mechanisms of this association are not clear and the prevalence of CD in patients with liver disease is variable depending on the associated liver disease. For example, while CD affects 1% of the general population, one study reports that about 4% of 185 cirrhotic patients who had undergone liver transplantation were found to have CD, and 3 of 4 pa- Abstract AIM: To study the small bowel (SB) mucosa on biopsy in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension and in non-cirrhotic controls and grade findings according to the Marsh criteria. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 51 consecutive patients undergoing an upper endoscopy for their routine medical care. Twenty five patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension were compared to 26 controls. We obtained coeliac serology and multiple upper small bowel biopsies on all 51 patients. A GI pathologist interpreted biopsies and graded findings according to the Marsh criteria. We assessed equivalence in Marsh grade between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic controls using the Mann-Whitney test for equivalence. RESULTS: Gender, ethnicity and age were similar between both groups. Marsh grades were equivalent between the groups. Grade of 0 was present in 96% and grade of 1 was present in 4% of both groups and there was no villus atrophy or decrease in villus/crypt ratio in patients with portal hypertension. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for the lack of villus atrophy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and supports the continuous reliance on the Marsh criteria when the diagnosis www.wjgnet.comWakim-Fleming J et al . Cirrhosis with portal hypertension does not cause atrophy of the small bowel mucosa 6371