2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-015-1988-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructural effects and antibiofilm activity of LFchimera against Burkholderia pseudomallei

Abstract: Lactoferrin chimera (LFchimera), a hybrid peptide containing the two antimicrobial stretches of the innate immunity factor bovine lactoferrin, viz. LFampin265-284 and LFcin17-30, has strikingly high antimicrobial activity against the category B pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei. The action mechanisms of LFchimera against B. pseudomallei is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to further investigate the effect of treated B. pseudomallei with LFchimera using (immune) electron microscopy. The effects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater antimicrobial efficacy exhibited by LFchimera compared to its peptides of origin, LFcin17-30 and LFampin265-284 has been observed in other studies, including studies testing the antibacterial effects of these peptides against pathogenic microorganisms, such as Candida, the halophiles V.parahaemolyticus and V. cholera, S. aureus, E. histolytica and E. coli (Bolscher et al 2012; Flores-Villasenor et al 2012a;Soto et al 2010;Puknun et al 2016). LFchimera has also been reported to exert antimicrobial activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei, Burkholderia thailandensis and Leishmania donovani…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greater antimicrobial efficacy exhibited by LFchimera compared to its peptides of origin, LFcin17-30 and LFampin265-284 has been observed in other studies, including studies testing the antibacterial effects of these peptides against pathogenic microorganisms, such as Candida, the halophiles V.parahaemolyticus and V. cholera, S. aureus, E. histolytica and E. coli (Bolscher et al 2012; Flores-Villasenor et al 2012a;Soto et al 2010;Puknun et al 2016). LFchimera has also been reported to exert antimicrobial activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei, Burkholderia thailandensis and Leishmania donovani…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The peptides magainin II and amikacin had no effect on EAEC viability at the concentrations and conditions used here (data not shown). (Puknun et al 2013;Puknun et al 2016;Silva et al 2012;Silva et al 2013). The high antimicrobial activity of LFchimera may be related to its structure, which adopts a secondary conformation (three-dimensional) that resembles that of native bLF (Bolscher et al 2009).…”
Section: Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recently the antimicrobial activities of the LFchimera were tested against isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei and compared to the preferential antibiotic of use ceftazidime (CAZ). All isolates including B. pseudomallei 979b shown to be resistant to CAZ, could be killed by 5–10 μM of LFchimera within 2 h, while CAZ, and LFcin17–30 and LFampin265–284 individually only inhibited the B. pseudomallei strains, still resulting in an overgrowth in 24 h (Puknun et al 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potency of this chimeric peptide provoked us to test the peptide against various human pathogens, like Staphylococcus aureus (Flores-Villasenor et al 2010) Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Flores-Villasenor et al 2012), Streptococcus pneumoniae Leon-Sicairos et al 2014) and Burkholderia pseudomallei (Kanthawong et al 2009; Puknun et al 2013, 2016), the latter which is classified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a category B biological warfare agent (BWA) (Rotz et al 2002). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bactericidal activity of LFchimera has been definitively stronger than that of the peptides (LFcin17-30 and LFampin265-284), as has been demonstrated in many experiments; due to lower concentrations, shorter incubation time, and salt concentrations present in the environment (needed for the growth of halophile bacteria) permit the bactericidal activity of LF chimera, compared with the peptides that conform this molecule which is not effective at these conditions (Bolscher et al, 2009 ; Haney et al, 2009 ; Leon-Sicairos et al, 2014 ). Otherwise, the microbicidal effect of LFchimera against Candida spp, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Staphylococcus aureus , enterotoxigenic and enterohaemorragic Escherichia coli , or in the parasites Entamoeba histolytica, Burkholderia thailandensis , and Leishmania pifanoi has been established in vitro (Bolscher et al, 2009 ; Lopez-Soto et al, 2009 , 2010 ; Flores-Villasenor et al, 2010 , 2012 ; Kanthawong et al, 2014 ; Leon-Sicairos et al, 2014 ; Puknun et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%