1993
DOI: 10.1016/0968-4328(93)90022-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructural study of the Distal part of the intestine of Oncorhynchus mykiss. Absorption of dietary protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pinocytotic uptake and subsequent intracellular digestion of exogenous proteins by rectal epithelia has been documented frequently in both larval fish and adult stomachless fish (Noaillac-Depeyre & Gas, 1976;Watanabe, 1981Watanabe, , 1984Govoni et al, 1986;Caceci & Hrubec, 1990;Abaurrea et al, 1993). In stomachless species, protein digestion occurs intracellularly in the rectal epithelium (Govoni et al, 1986), as also in species with functional stomachs (Ezeasor, 1981;Morrison, 1987), probably increasing protein digestion efficiency, when gastric emptying is too frequent for complete hydrolysis of proteins in the stomach (Ezeasor, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pinocytotic uptake and subsequent intracellular digestion of exogenous proteins by rectal epithelia has been documented frequently in both larval fish and adult stomachless fish (Noaillac-Depeyre & Gas, 1976;Watanabe, 1981Watanabe, , 1984Govoni et al, 1986;Caceci & Hrubec, 1990;Abaurrea et al, 1993). In stomachless species, protein digestion occurs intracellularly in the rectal epithelium (Govoni et al, 1986), as also in species with functional stomachs (Ezeasor, 1981;Morrison, 1987), probably increasing protein digestion efficiency, when gastric emptying is too frequent for complete hydrolysis of proteins in the stomach (Ezeasor, 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buccal or orophryngeal cavity shows structural adaptability and great plasticity for eating different food items (Abbate et al, ; Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, Ciriaco, & Germanà, ; Abbate, Guerrera, Montalbano, de Carlos, et al, ; Baaoom, ; El Bakary, ; El Bakary, ; Harabawy, Mekkawy, Mahmoud, Abdel‐Rahman, & Khidr, ; Horn, ; Kapoor & Khanna, ; Kapoor, Smit, & Verighina, ; Levanti et al, ). The alimentary canal morphology in fishes usually shows characteristic variations in relation to diet, habit of feeding, phylogeny, shape of body, and characters that show functional differentiation (Abaurrea, Nuñez, & Ostos, ; Anderson, ; Kapoor et al, ; Noaillac‐Depeyre & Gas, ). The digestive system of fishes changed in morphology and function in relation to taxonomy and different feeding habits (Abdulhadi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological studies of the digestive tract and adjacent structures have been reported for several fish species (Abaurrea et al. 1993; Ostos‐Garrido et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%