1981
DOI: 10.1051/parasite/1981563247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrastructure comparée du spermatozoïde des cestodes. Relations avec la phylogénèse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
68
1
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
68
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last half-century, ultrastructural descriptions of spermatozoa were used as valuable tools for phylogenetic inference in the flatworms (Platyhelminthes), particularly in the tapeworms (Eucestoda) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], but also in the Monogenea [4,11]. Considering digeneans, the increase of this kind of studies has motivated the analysis of spermiological data, particularly those related to the mature spermatozoon, in order to establish different types of spermatozoa according to their ultrastructural organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last half-century, ultrastructural descriptions of spermatozoa were used as valuable tools for phylogenetic inference in the flatworms (Platyhelminthes), particularly in the tapeworms (Eucestoda) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], but also in the Monogenea [4,11]. Considering digeneans, the increase of this kind of studies has motivated the analysis of spermiological data, particularly those related to the mature spermatozoon, in order to establish different types of spermatozoa according to their ultrastructural organization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Mahendrasingam et al (1989) describe two axonemes in the spermatozoon of Trilocularia acanthiaevulgaris, while in the remaining studied Phyllobothriidae namely Phyllobothrium gracile (Mokhtar-Maamouri 1979) and Pseudanthobothrium hanseni (MacKinnon and Burt 1984) there is only one axoneme, according to the spermatozoon pattern assigned to this family (see Levron et al 2010). Such differences evidenced within the same family may cause controversies for the phylogeny of this group because the presence of a single axoneme should be considered an evolved character (Euzet et al 1981). Moreover, the number of axonemes in the mature spermatozoon constitutes one of the principal characters considered by Levron et al (2010) for the distinction of the Eucestoda spermatozoa.…”
Section: Spermatozoonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now widely accepted that ultrastructural spermatological characters contribute to a better understanding of relationships within the Platyhelminthes (Euzet et al 1981;Justine 1991Justine , 1995Justine , 1998Justine , 2001Hoberg et al 1997Hoberg et al , 2001Olson et al 2001;Bruňanská 2010;Levron et al 2010). To our knowledge, there are ultrastructural data on the spermiogenesis and/or spermatozoon of four onchobothriids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usefulness of ultrastructural data of spermiogenesis and the spermatozoon to elucidate the phylogenetic relationships within the Platyhelminthes has been demonstrated by several authors (Euzet et al 1981;Justine 1991Justine , 1998Justine , 2001Bâ and Marchand 1995;Levron et al 2010). To our knowledge, the spermatological characters of only 13 species of the former "Pseudophyllidea" have been studied, including 10 bothriocephalideans and three diphyllobothriideans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%