2019
DOI: 10.1364/oe.27.024194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrathin, lightweight, and freestanding metallic mesh for transparent electromagnetic interference shielding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[124] Overall, the optical and electrical performances of metal-mesh-based FTEs reported in recent years have reached a very high level. [125][126][127][128][129] The main challenge for the metal mesh comes from the fabrication process, which usually involves costly and timeconsuming technologies such as photolithography, nanoimprint lithography, e-beam lithography, vacuum-based thermal evaporation/sputtering, metal etching, and lift-off processes. In addition, metal mesh-based FTEs also face the roughness issue that also occurs on metal nanowire networks.…”
Section: Metal-based-flexible Transparent Electrodes Made Of Metal Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[124] Overall, the optical and electrical performances of metal-mesh-based FTEs reported in recent years have reached a very high level. [125][126][127][128][129] The main challenge for the metal mesh comes from the fabrication process, which usually involves costly and timeconsuming technologies such as photolithography, nanoimprint lithography, e-beam lithography, vacuum-based thermal evaporation/sputtering, metal etching, and lift-off processes. In addition, metal mesh-based FTEs also face the roughness issue that also occurs on metal nanowire networks.…”
Section: Metal-based-flexible Transparent Electrodes Made Of Metal Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conducting shield also strongly attenuates the EM waves because of the strong eddy currents and ohmic losses inside the shield. [79] Conventional metals (Ag, Cu, Al, Ni), being the most conductive materials, have been used against EMI for decades; [80][81][82][83][84] however, their higher density and susceptibility to corrosion limit their potential applications in lightweight mobile electronics. [85,86] Hence, different conducting materials, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon nanofibers (1D), expanded graphite, rGO, graphene, and MoS 2 (2D materials) have been examined as substitutes for heavy metals.…”
Section: Emi Shieldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the literature data [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 ], Figure 2 plots of the technological limitations of various approaches to forming grooves in transparent materials or directly forming conductors on the substrate surface. The markers show the values of the width and depth of the groove’s or line’s height, obtained from the literature sources, and the lines show the t...…”
Section: The Analysis Of the Production Technologies Of Transparent Mesh Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%