1975
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1975.tb06690.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraviolet Irradiation of Suspensions of Micro‐organisms: Possible Errors Involved in the Estimation of Average Fluence Per Cell*

Abstract: Abstract— Experiments on cell survival in concentrated suspensions of Escherichia coli B/r show that application of the well known “Morowitz correction” (H. J. Morowitz, (1950) Science111, 229–230) can lead to large errors in estimation of the average fluence per cell if light scattering is not taken into account. The magnitude of the effect is illustrated for this organism, but it is pointed out that experimenters should determine the correction for each organism and set of experimental conditions used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to irradiate at high cell densities in order to obtain sufficient cells in each sample to assay uptake within the period (1 min) during which uptake is linear. Due to light scatter and cell shielding (self absorption) the average dose received by a cell is less than the measured dose especially at short wavelengths (Jagger, 1967;Jagger et al, 1975). However, most of the light scattered by a bacterial suspension is deflected only a few degrees (Koch, 1961) and should be considered as transmitted light for the purposes of correction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is necessary to irradiate at high cell densities in order to obtain sufficient cells in each sample to assay uptake within the period (1 min) during which uptake is linear. Due to light scatter and cell shielding (self absorption) the average dose received by a cell is less than the measured dose especially at short wavelengths (Jagger, 1967;Jagger et al, 1975). However, most of the light scattered by a bacterial suspension is deflected only a few degrees (Koch, 1961) and should be considered as transmitted light for the purposes of correction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the light scattered by a bacterial suspension is deflected only a few degrees (Koch, 1961) and should be considered as transmitted light for the purposes of correction. As shown by Jagger (1975). the use of a spectrophotometer provides a true Morowitz (1950) correction, providing its design allows for maximal collection of scattered light by the photomultiplier.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical densities of such suspensions were high, varying from 1 to 6 from experiment to experiment depending on the extent to which the suspension was depleted of blood and blood cells before irradiation. We have corrected the incident doses to give average doses through mixed samples (16) but the corrections may have large errors (17) and hence a strict dosimetric comparison from one experiment to another is not valid although comparisons within an experiment are valid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3 mf aliquot of mitochondrial suspension (2 mg mitochondrial protein per mf giving approximately 12% transmittance at 254 nm as measured with an Aminco DW-2 UV-visible spectrophotometer) was added to a small vial to a depth of 5mm. The suspension was maintained on crushed ice and constantly stirred during exposure to mercury vapour ultraviolet light from a General Electric G4T4/1 germicidal fluorescent lamp (90% radiant energy at 254 nm) at a distance of 15 cm for 2.5, 5.0 and 15.0 min, yielding dosages, following correction for turbidity as described by Morowitz (1950) and following the recommendations of Jagger et al (1975) to minimize scattered light losses using the Aminoc DW-2 spectrophotometer in determining turbidity, of 150, 300 and 900J/m2. Fluence rate at 254nm was estimated to be l.OJ/mz/s by potassium ferrioxalate actinometry using an actively stirred 3 me sample in a cylindrical cuvette (2.5 cm in diameter) filled to a depth of 0.5 cm assuming 471 nJ/mol, a quantum yield of 1.26 and total absorption of photons by the actinometer solution.…”
Section: Isolation Of Bean Mitochondriamentioning
confidence: 99%