2000
DOI: 10.1002/1096-9888(200008)35:8<1025::aid-jms30>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraviolet/matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric characterization of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid-induced reductive hydrogenation of oligonucleotides on cytosine residues

Abstract: The changes in the ion signals in the isotope cluster, mass resolution, signal-to-noise ratio and mass accuracy for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) of DNA oligonucleotides (dGGATC, dCAGCt, and dAACCGTT) and their fragment ions were evaluated, and these data were compared with those obtained using 3-hydroxypicolinic acid. Mass spectra obtained by using 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (2,5-DHB) appear to have differences from the theoretical isotopic clusters, which arise by reductive hydrogenation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, with carefully designed sample preparation methods (e.g., employing a thin-layer matrix [12] or using a matrix/comatrix to increase sample spot homogeneity [13]), some groups have achieved satisfactory quantitative results for ODNs over a dynamic range of at least one order of magnitude. Other sample preparations aimed at providing more homogeneous crystallization between analyte and matrix include "seed-layer" [14 -16], two-layer (underlayer/overlayer) [17,18], fast evaporation of matrix solvent to produce a thin-layer matrix film [19], and electrospray deposition of the matrix/sample [20]. Although improvements in quantification were achieved [12,13], these sample preparation methods were strongly dependent on the nature of the sample and the expertise of the spectrometrist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, with carefully designed sample preparation methods (e.g., employing a thin-layer matrix [12] or using a matrix/comatrix to increase sample spot homogeneity [13]), some groups have achieved satisfactory quantitative results for ODNs over a dynamic range of at least one order of magnitude. Other sample preparations aimed at providing more homogeneous crystallization between analyte and matrix include "seed-layer" [14 -16], two-layer (underlayer/overlayer) [17,18], fast evaporation of matrix solvent to produce a thin-layer matrix film [19], and electrospray deposition of the matrix/sample [20]. Although improvements in quantification were achieved [12,13], these sample preparation methods were strongly dependent on the nature of the sample and the expertise of the spectrometrist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%