1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1996.tb00899.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Un‐filtered recordings from insect taste sensilla

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although methanol is thought to damage the nerve cells, which then does not allow for long recording durations, and most likely influences impulse frequencies, it has the advantage of dissolving material obstructing the pores and helping to obtain a good contact (Maher and Thiery 2004). Electrophysiological responses from the mesothoracic distal tarsomere were recorded by combining different techniques previously used to study single chemosensory sensilla (Hodgson et al 1955;den Otter and van der Starre 1967;Marion-Poll and van der Pers 1996;Solinas et al 2001;Maher and Thiery 2004;Ganassi et al 2007). The indifferent electrode, a glass micropipette (tip 4-5μm diameter) filled with a ringer solution (Kaissling 1995), was inserted into the aphid prothorax.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although methanol is thought to damage the nerve cells, which then does not allow for long recording durations, and most likely influences impulse frequencies, it has the advantage of dissolving material obstructing the pores and helping to obtain a good contact (Maher and Thiery 2004). Electrophysiological responses from the mesothoracic distal tarsomere were recorded by combining different techniques previously used to study single chemosensory sensilla (Hodgson et al 1955;den Otter and van der Starre 1967;Marion-Poll and van der Pers 1996;Solinas et al 2001;Maher and Thiery 2004;Ganassi et al 2007). The indifferent electrode, a glass micropipette (tip 4-5μm diameter) filled with a ringer solution (Kaissling 1995), was inserted into the aphid prothorax.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contacting a taste sensillum with the stimulus electrode triggered a data acquisition sequence (sampling rate, 10 kHz, 12 bits; DT2821 Data Translation), which was stored as an individual file on a computer. Data were then analyzed with AWAVE software (36). Spikes were detected and analyzed by using interactive procedures from a custom-made software package, DBWAVE. To express DTI (31-33) in a limited number of GAL4-expressing neurons in the labellum of NP1017, we used the mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker system (34).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a taste neuron is excited to generate impulses, fluctuations in potential between the two electrodes are recorded and amplified through a high-input impedance preamplifier circuit. An important feature of the preamplifier circuit that was developed later is that it compensates for the large offset potential between the sensillum and the reference electrode (typically 100 mV) (Marion-Poll and van der Pers 1996). The signal is then filtered (e.g., low pass 3 kHz, high pass 0.1 kHz), further amplified (100×-1000×), and transferred to a computer (sampling rate typically ≥10 kHz) that has the appropriate software for storing and analyzing the data.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Recording From the Gustatory Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%