2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23135907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UN-YOLOv5s: A UAV-Based Aerial Photography Detection Algorithm

Abstract: With the progress of science and technology, artificial intelligence is widely used in various disciplines and has produced amazing results. The research of the target detection algorithm has significantly improved the performance and role of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and plays an irreplaceable role in preventing forest fires, evacuating crowded people, surveying and rescuing explorers. At this stage, the target detection algorithm deployed in UAVs has been applied to production and life, but making the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, at the same size, their detection precision is lower than the SMT-YOLOv5 model proposed in this study. It is worth mentioning that compared with the models proposed by other scholars (such as KPE-YOLOv5s [ 30 ], UN-YOLOV5s [ 31 ], and FE-YOLOv5s [ 32 ]), SMT-YOLOv5s has a superior performance in terms of mAP@50, mAP@0.5:0.95, and GFLOPS values. KPE-YOLOv5s redesigns the size of the anchor box using the K-Means++ clustering algorithm and introduces the SE attention module, but the network feature fusion part lacks optimization, resulting in relatively poor small object detection precision.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, at the same size, their detection precision is lower than the SMT-YOLOv5 model proposed in this study. It is worth mentioning that compared with the models proposed by other scholars (such as KPE-YOLOv5s [ 30 ], UN-YOLOV5s [ 31 ], and FE-YOLOv5s [ 32 ]), SMT-YOLOv5s has a superior performance in terms of mAP@50, mAP@0.5:0.95, and GFLOPS values. KPE-YOLOv5s redesigns the size of the anchor box using the K-Means++ clustering algorithm and introduces the SE attention module, but the network feature fusion part lacks optimization, resulting in relatively poor small object detection precision.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Anchor Frame Configuration. P2 (3,4), (6,5), (4,8), (11,6) P3 (6,12), (11,11), (10,20), (20,10) P4 (17,18), (31,16), (17,32) In the domain of small target detection in UAV imagery, a significant challenge involves effectively combining multi-scale features [20]. As shown in Figure 2, The original YOLOv5 algorithm used a cascade architecture comprising the feature pyramid network (FPN) [21] and pyramid attention network (PANet) [22] for feature fusion.…”
Section: Detection Branchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the proposed YOLOv8 exhibits a recall of 78.2%, a precision value of 89.99%, and a mAP of 87.4% when trained with 150 epochs. The testing performance of the proposed obstacle detection based on the YOLOv8 model is compared with the other existing object detection models, i.e., YOLOv7 [28], YOLOv5 [24], SSD [35], and Faster-RCNN [34]. The performance is analyzed for all classes with different iteration steps with our own datasets, as shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study proposed a YOLOv5-like architecture with ConvMixers and an additional prediction head for object detection using UAVs, which were trained and tested on the VisDrone 2021 dataset. Furthermore, the authors in [24] modified the YOLOv5 architecture for better aerial image analysis performance, concentrating on uses like mapping land usage and environmental monitoring.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%